Reflexes of Mental Architecture in Second-Language Acquisition: The Interpretation of Combien Extractions in English-French Interlanguage

In this article, we present the results of an empirical study of the interpretation of left-branch combien 'how many' extractions in English-French interlanguage. Aspects of the syntax-semantics interface seem specific to natural language and therefore should provide a test of the hypothesis that (adult) second-language (L2) knowledge is epistemologically equivalent to (adult) first-language (L1) knowledge. Specifically, if idiosyncratic target language (form, interpretation) pairings not plausibly acquirable on the basis of the input alone are indeed acquired by L2 learners, then such acquisition must be the product of the modular interactions governed by Universal Grammar (UG) that account for these properties in L1 grammars. The results of this study show that knowledge of the interpretation of left-branch combien extraction is detectable in English-French interlanguage, well beyond what can be expected on the basis of English intuitions. This is suggestive of the role of UG in constraining L2 acquisition.

[1]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners - a study of the acquisition of German word order , 1986 .

[2]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[3]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: Testing a proposed universal , 1989 .

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[5]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[6]  J. Carlos.  Languages of the Mind , 1995 .

[7]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas and Dynamic Logic , 1997 .

[8]  Elizabeth Ritter,et al.  Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew , 1991 .

[9]  Elisabeth Villalta,et al.  The Role of Context in the Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguities , 2003, J. Semant..

[10]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Intervention Effects, Monotonicity and Scope , 1992 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky.  Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures , 1993 .

[12]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[13]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[14]  Robin Cooper,et al.  The syntax and semantics of when-questions , 1982 .

[15]  Hans-Georg Obenauer.  ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF EMPTY CATEGORIES , 1985 .

[16]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking , 1993 .

[17]  Godehard Link,et al.  Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals , 1987 .

[18]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[19]  B. D. Schwartz.  The epistemological status of second language acquisition , 1986 .

[20]  J. Doetjes,et al.  RIGHTWARD FLOATING QUANTIFIERS FLOAT TO THE LEFT , 1992 .

[21]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[22]  Suzanne Flynn,et al.  A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition , 1986 .

[23]  D. Cresti.  Extraction and reconstruction , 1995 .

[24]  Hotze Rullmann,et al.  Maximality in the semantics of wh -constructions , 1995 .

[25]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Case, scope, and binding , 1993 .

[26]  Richard S. Kayne.  Facets of Romance past participle agreement , 1989 .

[27]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development , 1997 .

[28]  Kenneth Ray.  Review of Generalized quantifiers: linguistic and logical approaches by Peter Gärdenfors. D. Reidel 1987. , 1989 .

[29]  Ray Jackendo,et al.  Languages of the Mind , 1992 .