Region of Feasibility of Interference Alignment in Underwater Sensor Networks

To enable underwater applications such as coastal and tactical surveillance, undersea explorations, and real-time picture/video acquisition, there is a need to achieve high data-rate and reliable communications underwater, which translates into attaining high acoustic channel spectral efficiencies. Interference alignment (IA), which has been recently proposed for radio-frequency multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) terrestrial communication systems, aims at improving the spectral efficiency by enabling nodes to transmit data simultaneously at a rate equal to half of the interference-free channel capacity. The core of IA in the space domain lies in designing transmit precoding matrices for each transmitter such that all the interfering signals align at the receiver along a direction different from that of the desired signal. While promising, however, there are still challenges to solve for the practical use of IA underwater, i.e., imperfect acoustic channel knowledge, high computational complexity, and high communication delay. In this paper, a feasibility study on the employment of IA underwater is presented. A novel distributed computing framework for sharing processing resources in the network so to parallelize and speed IA algorithms up is proposed; also, such framework enables “ensemble learning” of various precoding matrices computed using different (competing) IA algorithms so to achieve efficient alignment of the interference at the receiver. The robustness of the IA technique against imperfect acoustic channel knowledge is also quantified by estimating precoding matrices based on predicted channel coefficients. Finally, the performance of an algorithm to predict the underwater acoustic channel impulse response is presented using real data sets.

[1]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Degrees of Freedom Region of the MIMO $X$ Channel , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Changho Suh,et al.  Interference Alignment for Cellular Networks , 2008, 2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.

[3]  Parastoo Qarabaqi,et al.  Small scale characterization of underwater acoustic channels , 2012, WUWNet '12.

[4]  김성문,et al.  [해외 대학 연구센터 소개] Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , 2012 .

[5]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  On the Design of Energy-efficient Routing Protocols in Underwater Networks , 2007, 2007 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[6]  T.M. Duman,et al.  High-Rate Communication for Underwater Acoustic Channels Using Multiple Transmitters and Space–Time Coding: Receiver Structures and Experimental Results , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[7]  Zukang Shen,et al.  Short range wireless channel prediction using local information , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[8]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  A Distributed Numerical Approach to Interference Alignment and Applications to Wireless Interference Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  The Feasibility of Interference Alignment Over Measured MIMO-OFDM Channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  A.B. Baggeroer,et al.  Spatial modulation experiments in the underwater acoustic channel , 2005, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[11]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[12]  H C Song,et al.  Phase-coherent communications without explicit phase tracking. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A. H. Kayran,et al.  On Feasibility of Interference Alignment in MIMO Interference Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos,et al.  Interference Alignment as a Rank Constrained Rank Minimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Dario Pompili,et al.  An autonomic resource provisioning framework for mobile computing grids , 2012, ICAC '12.

[16]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[17]  Wai Ho Mow,et al.  On the Performance of the MIMO Zero-Forcing Receiver in the Presence of Channel Estimation Error , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[18]  Dina Katabi,et al.  Interference alignment and cancellation , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[19]  H. Akaike Fitting autoregressive models for prediction , 1969 .

[20]  S. Shahabudeen,et al.  Throughput of Networks With Large Propagation Delays , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[21]  Xin Yao,et al.  Diversity creation methods: a survey and categorisation , 2004, Inf. Fusion.

[22]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Degrees of Freedom of the $K$-User Interference Channel , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[23]  Dario Pompili,et al.  A cross-layer communication solution for multimedia applications in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[24]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Interference alignment for the K user MIMO interference channel , 2009, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[25]  Pius W. Q. Lee,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of multihop ARQ for reliable communications in underwater acoustic networks , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[26]  Vahid Tarokh,et al.  On the degrees-of-freedom of the MIMO interference channel , 2008, 2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[27]  T.C. Yang Toward continuous underwater acoustic communications , 2008, OCEANS 2008.