Representing analogies to influence fixation and creativity: A study comparing computer-aided design, photographs, and sketches

Abstract Many tools are being developed to assist designers in retrieving analogies. One critical question these designers face is how these analogues should be represented in order to minimize design fixation and maximize idea generation. To address this question, an experiment is presented that compares various representations' influence on creativity and design fixation. This experiment presents an effective example (analogue) as computer-aided design (CAD), sketch, or photograph representations. We found that all representations induced fixation, and the degree of fixation did not vary significantly. We also found that CAD representations encourage engineering designers to identify and copy the key effective features of the example. CAD and photo representations also produced a higher quality of design concepts. Results from this experiment offer insights into how these various representations may be used in examples during idea generation; CAD representations appear to offer the greatest advantages during the idea generation process. The results from this experiment also indicate that analogical databases of effective design examples should include CAD and photolike images of the analogue rather than sketches.

[1]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Design Fixation on Non-Verbal Stimuli: The Influence of Simple vs. Rich Pictorial Information on Design Problem-Solving , 2009 .

[2]  Takashi Kiriyama,et al.  Strategic knowledge acquisition: a case study of learning through prototyping , 1998, Knowl. Based Syst..

[3]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Design Team Convergence: The Influence of Example Solution Quality , 2009 .

[4]  Janine M. Benyus,et al.  Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature , 1997 .

[5]  Thomas Strothotte,et al.  Assessing the effect of non-photorealistic rendered images in CAD , 1996, CHI '96.

[6]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Analysis of Capstone Design Reports: Visual Representations , 2011 .

[7]  J. Wiley Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[8]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Brett Robertson,et al.  Creativity and the Use of CAD Tools: Lessons for Engineering Design Education From Industry , 2007 .

[10]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  The Influence of Different Pictorial Representations during Idea Generation. , 2011 .

[11]  John S. Gero,et al.  The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers , 2002 .

[12]  David Craig,et al.  The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process , 1990, Comput. Graph..

[13]  T. Purcell,et al.  Mental synthesis and creativity in design: an experimental examination , 2000 .

[14]  Julie Linsey,et al.  Spanning the complexity chasm: A research approach to move from simple to complex engineering systems , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[15]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[16]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2009 .

[17]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[18]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sketch interpretation in design communication , 1999 .

[19]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design , 2009 .

[20]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  An Analysis of Sketching Skill and Its Role in Early Stage Engineering Design , 2007 .

[21]  John S. Gero,et al.  Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[22]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[23]  Manuel Contero,et al.  Computer-aided sketching as a tool to promote innovation in the new product development process , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[24]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically-Inspired Innovation in Engineering Design: a Cognitive Study , 2007 .

[25]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[26]  David Wallace,et al.  Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation , 2013 .

[27]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[28]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[29]  Ben Jonson,et al.  Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age , 2005 .

[30]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[32]  Noe Vargas Hernandez,et al.  Research on encouraging sketching in engineering design , 2012, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[33]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  Evaluating a Functional Basis , 2003 .

[34]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  REFERENCES TO PAST DESIGNS , 2005 .

[35]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[36]  H. Christiaans Creativity as a Design Criterion , 2002 .

[37]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  The Role of Sketch Finish and Style in User Responses to Early Stage Design Concepts , 2011 .

[38]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Role of Sunk Cost in Engineering Idea Generation: An Experimental Investigation , 2013 .

[39]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Examining design fixation in engineering idea generation: the role of example modality , 2013 .

[40]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Sketches of thought , 1997 .

[41]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[42]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Compound Analogical Design: Interaction between Problem Decomposition and Analogical Transfer in Biologically Inspired Design , 2008 .

[43]  H.H.C.M. Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in design: the role of domain knowledge in designing , 1992 .

[44]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Nature of creative analogies in biologically inspired innovative design , 2009, C&C '09.

[45]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[46]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[47]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[48]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[49]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Analysis of Capstone Design Reports: Visual Representations , 2011 .

[50]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and problem presentation in idea-generating groups. , 2000 .

[51]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[52]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  “Collaborating To Success”: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques , 2005 .

[53]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Abstraction of Biological Analogies for Design , 2004 .

[54]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Evaluation of the functional basis using an information theoretic approach , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[56]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation , 2012 .

[57]  John S. Gero,et al.  Effects of examples on the results of a design activity , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[58]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation , 2011 .

[59]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations , 2012 .

[60]  Ashley Lynn Grenier Conceptual understanding and the use of hand-sketching in mechanical engineering design , 2008 .

[61]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically inspired design: process and products , 2009 .

[62]  Jean Thilmany Pros and Cons of CAD , 2006 .

[63]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[64]  David Clark-Carter,et al.  Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design To Report , 1997 .

[65]  John S. Gero,et al.  Sketching as mental imagery processing , 2001 .

[66]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods , 2011 .

[67]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[68]  H. Berg,et al.  Cats' Paws and Catapults: Mechanical Worlds of Nature and People , 1998 .

[69]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exposure Effects in Design Idea Generation: Unconscious Conformity or a Product of Sampling Probability? , 2006 .

[70]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective , 2010 .

[71]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[72]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Sketches for Design and Design of Sketches , 2003 .

[73]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How designers perceive sketches , 2006 .

[74]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Computer-aided design versus sketching: An exploratory case study , 2012, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[75]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Modeling Cognitive Interactions During Group Brainstorming , 1998 .

[76]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design Fixation and Its Mitigation: A Study on the Role of Expertise , 2013 .

[77]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  5.8 Analogies per Hour , 2002, AID.

[78]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  INFLUENCE OF DESIGN REPRESENTATION ON EFFECTIVENESS OF IDEA GENERATION , 2001 .

[79]  J. Vincent,et al.  Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[80]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .

[81]  Ashok K. Goel Design, Analogy, and Creativity , 1997, IEEE Expert.