Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management

The steady growth of R&D costs and the increasingly widespread dissemination of information and communication technology over the past decade have resulted in the affirmation of the paradigm of open innovation, which consists in the continual expansion of access to sources of technological innovation outside the firm itself. Industrial companies are, in fact, turning more frequently to collaboration with university departments and other public and private research centers, and there is a notable increase in agreements regarding technological cooperation and the exchange of know-how between companies. In addition, recourse to highly specialized small research companies is on the rise. This is common, for example in the pharmaceutical sector and, more generally, in the area of biotechnological research. Furthermore, we are witnessing the development of the new role of innovation broker. These factors alter the traditional profile of company R&D structures, within which the role of researchers and technologists often changes. In particular, matrix and network organizational models are on the increase, and the professional figures of ‘integrators of knowledge and expertise’ (T-men) are assuming major importance at the expense of traditional scientists. As a consequence, the model for training and managing scientific personnel tends to change. This model, as it moves away from the prevailing pattern adopted by firms in Anglophone countries, is continually drawing closer, even from a cultural standpoint, to the R&D management approach found in the Japanese and German companies. The aim of this article is to investigate how the adoption of open innovation has changed the organizational structures of R&D and altered the methods used in managing its personnel. The results of the study are based on the analysis of four case studies of Italian multinational firms operating in the pharmaceutical, food, specialty chemical, and aerospace industries.

[1]  R. Hanson,et al.  Managing human resources. , 1982, The Journal of nursing administration.

[2]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Technological Knowledge Base, R&D Organization Structure and Alliance Formation: Evidence from the Biopharmaceutical Industry , 2007 .

[3]  Alain Roger,et al.  Event-driven careers for R&D professionals? , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Bart van Ark,et al.  The structure and location of business R&D: recent trends and measurement implications , 2008 .

[5]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[6]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[7]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  Performance implications of organisational structure and knowledge sharing in multinational R&D networks , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[8]  S. Frenkel,et al.  Managing people where people really matter: the management of human resources in biotech companies , 2006 .

[9]  Robert Kirschbaum,et al.  Open Innovation In Practice , 2005 .

[10]  P. F. Greenfield,et al.  Towards a fourth generation R&D management model-research networks in knowledge management , 1999 .

[11]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[12]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[13]  M. Lenox,et al.  When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? , 2003 .

[14]  R. Boutellier,et al.  Organizing global R&D: challenges and dilemmas , 2004 .

[15]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice , 1997 .

[16]  Thomas Sy,et al.  Challenges and Strategies of Matrix Organizations: Top-Level and Mid-Level Managers' Perspectives , 2005 .

[17]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[18]  D. Buyens,et al.  Strategic career development for R&D professionals: Lessons from field research , 1997 .

[19]  D. Nobelius,et al.  Towards the sixth generation of R&D management , 2004 .

[20]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  A study of career needs, career development programs, job satisfaction and the turnover intentions of R&D personnel , 2004 .

[21]  S. Garrett-Jones,et al.  Scientists, Career Choices and Organisational Change: Managing Human Resources in Cross Sector R&D Organisations , 2005 .

[22]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[23]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Cross-Functional Dynamics in New Product Development , 2000 .

[24]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation Teams , 2010 .

[25]  Clifford M. Detz,et al.  Corporate-Supported Research in a Reengineered Technology Organization , 1996 .

[26]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[27]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How to build collaborative advantage , 2004 .

[28]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[29]  Yu-An Huang,et al.  R&D sourcing strategies: Determinants and consequences , 2009 .

[30]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  HRM and Project Intensification in R&D-Based Companies: A Study of Volvo Car Corporation and AstraZeneca , 2006 .

[31]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  R & D strategy and organisation , 2001 .

[32]  A. Nosella,et al.  Multiple Network Leadership as a Strategic Asset: The Carlo Gavazzi Space Case , 2007 .

[33]  S. Mazzocchi Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology , 2004 .

[34]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[35]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[36]  Rod Core competencies and the strategic management of R & D , 2006 .

[37]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Corporate Venture Capital as a Strategy for External Innovation: An Exploratory Empirical Study , 2005 .

[38]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[39]  V. Chiesa,et al.  The Externalisation of R&D Activities and the Growing Market of Product Development Services , 2004 .

[40]  R. Katz,et al.  The dual ladder : motivational solution or managerial delusion? , 1986 .

[41]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Unravelling the Process from Closed to Open Innovation: Evidence from Mature, Asset-Intensive Industries , 2010 .

[42]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions , 2002 .

[43]  M. Badawy Industrial Scientists and Engineers: Motivational Style Differences , 1971 .

[44]  G. Petroni Strategic planning and research and development—Can we integrate them? , 1983 .

[45]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[46]  E. Larson,et al.  Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights , 1987 .