Hydropeaking impact on a riparian ground beetle community

The Common Meuse reach is strongly influenced by the operation of a hydropower plant at the upstream weir of Lixhe, especially during periods of low flow. Ecologically based in-stream flow requirements and fluctuation thresholds have already been determined for this reach by reconstruction of the natural discharge course from historic and actual reference conditions. Nevertheless, more evidence from the present biota at risk has been demanded. This study therefore attempts to define boundary conditions for the low flow regime from the analysis of riparian ground beetles in this river reach. To achieve this, reference conditions for the hydroregime aspects of flow variation were determined. Then, using the habitat templet approach, the hydropeaking pressure was related to biological quality elements. Finally, after detecting the impact on the specific gravel bar ground beetles, thresholds and boundary conditions were determined for the hydropeaking pressure in peak velocity. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Kershner.  Setting Riparian/Aquatic Restoration Objectives within a Watershed Context , 1997 .

[2]  Nick Otting,et al.  An Ecological Perspective of Riparian and Stream Restoration in the Western United States , 1997 .

[3]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[4]  J. Andersen,et al.  Riparian Beetles, a Unique, but Vulnerable Element in the Fauna of Fennoscandia , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[5]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Ecological Aspects of the Restoration Strategy for a River-Floodplain System on the Danube River in Austria , 1997 .

[6]  Bas Pedroli,et al.  Setting targets in strategies for river restoration , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  D. Hering.  Riparian beetles (Coleoptera) along a small stream in the Oregon Coast Range and their interactions with the aquatic environment. , 1998 .

[8]  D. Hering,et al.  Riparian ground beetles (Coeloptera, Carabidae) preying on aquatic invertebrates: a feeding strategy in alpine floodplains , 1997, Oecologia.

[9]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Carabid Beetles: Ecology and Evolution , 1994, Series Entomologica.

[10]  K. Desender.  Ecomorphological adaptations of riparian carabid beetles , 1989 .

[11]  J. Gore,et al.  Macroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: A role in stream management and restoration , 2001 .

[12]  A. Harby,et al.  Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo Salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking , 2001 .

[13]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological Factors Controlling Stream Zoobenthos with Emphasis on Thermal Modification of Regulated Streams , 1979 .

[14]  Mike R. Scarsbrook,et al.  Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat templet theory , 1997 .

[15]  I. Growns,et al.  Ecological effects of flow regulation on macroinvertebrate and periphytic diatom assemblages in the Hawkesbury–Nepean River, Australia , 2001 .

[16]  E. Stanley,et al.  Problems and constraints in managing rivers with variable flow regimes , 2000 .

[17]  Yao Yin,et al.  Naturalization of the flood regime in regulated rivers the case of the upper Mississippi River , 1998 .

[18]  R. Cushman.  Review of Ecological Effects of Rapidly Varying Flows Downstream from Hydroelectric Facilities , 1985 .

[19]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[20]  J. Sadler,et al.  The hydroecological controls and conservation value of beetles on exposed riverine sediments in England and Wales , 2004 .

[21]  M. Dufrêne,et al.  Ground beetle habitat templets and riverbank integrity , 2005 .

[22]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[23]  J. Friedman,et al.  Mortality of riparian box elder from sediment mobilization and extended inundation , 1999 .