Evaluating 3D Printers Using Data Envelopment Analysis

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is an established powerful mathematical programming technique, which has been employed quite extensively for assessing the efficiency/performance of various physical or virtual and simple or complex production systems, as well as of consumer and industrial products and technologies. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether DEA may be employed for evaluating the technical efficiency/performance of 3D printers, an advanced manufacturing technology of increasing importance for the manufacturing sector. For this purpose, a representative sample of 3D printers based on Fused Deposition Modeling technology is examined. The technical factors/parameters of 3D printers, which are incorporated in the DEA, are investigated and discussed in detail. DEA evaluation results compare favorably with relevant benchmarks from experts, indicating that the suggested DEA technique in conjunction with technical and expert evaluation could be employed for evaluating the performance of a highly technological system, such as the 3D printer.

[1]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  The EVR model for sustainability – A tool to optimise product design and resolve strategic dilemmas , 2001 .

[2]  Tomas Baležentis,et al.  Context-dependent assessment of the efficiency of Lithuanian family farms , 2014 .

[3]  T. Do,et al.  FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments , 2020, Polymers.

[4]  Jyh-Rong Chou,et al.  A Gestalt-Minimalism-based decision-making model for evaluating product form design , 2011 .

[5]  P. Bogetoft,et al.  Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R , 2011 .

[6]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A new DEA model for technology selection in the presence of ordinal data , 2013 .

[7]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading , 2005 .

[8]  W. Bowlin,et al.  Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) , 1998 .

[9]  E. Ahmady,et al.  Technology selection in the presence of fuzzy data and dual-role factors , 2012 .

[10]  Shinn Sun,et al.  Assessing computer numerical control machines using data envelopment analysis , 2002 .

[11]  Chialin Chen,et al.  Sustainable design performance evaluation with applications in the automobile industry: Focusing on inefficiency by undesirable factors , 2013 .

[12]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Comparing products using data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[13]  Harm-Jan Steenhuis,et al.  Consumer additive manufacturing or 3D printing adoption: an exploratory study , 2016 .

[14]  Shiang-Tai Liu,et al.  A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Mohsen M. D. Hassan,et al.  An evaluation of input and output of expert systems for selection of material handling equipment , 2014 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  L. Seiford,et al.  Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .

[18]  Dong‐Shang Chang,et al.  Applying DEA to enhance assessment capability of FMEA , 2009 .

[19]  F. Piller,et al.  Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited , 2015 .

[20]  Song Jin Yu,et al.  Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A nonparametric stochastic procedure for FMS evaluation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Hokey Min,et al.  Evaluating the comparative efficiency of the postal services in OECD countries using context-dependent and measure-specific data envelopment analysis , 2015 .

[23]  Jun Bi,et al.  Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs , 2010 .

[24]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[25]  Kazim Baris Atici,et al.  Efficiency evaluations with context-dependent and measure-specific data envelopment approaches: An application in a World Bank supported project ☆ , 2010 .

[26]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[27]  K. J. Rogers,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations , 2008 .

[28]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes , 1991 .

[29]  Tai-Yoo Kim,et al.  The Measurement of Consumption Efficiency Considering the Discrete Choice of Consumers , 2005 .

[30]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Evaluating and selecting investments in industrial robots , 1999 .

[31]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[32]  Johan Söderberg,et al.  How open hardware drives digital fabrication tools such as the 3D printer , 2013 .

[33]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[34]  Eduardo González,et al.  HOW CAR DEALERS ADJUST PRICES TO REACH THE PRODUCT EFFICIENCY FRONTIER IN THE SPANISH AUTOMOBILE MARKET , 2015 .

[35]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data , 2008 .

[36]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Input and output scaling in advanced manufacturing technology: theory and application , 2010 .

[37]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Identifying "Best-Buys" In The Market Of Prepaid Mobile Telephony: An Application Of Imprecise Dea , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[38]  Guha Manogharan,et al.  Making sense of 3-D printing: Creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services , 2014 .

[39]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[41]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[42]  N. Ismail,et al.  Application of analytical hierarchy process in the design concept selection of automotive composite bumper beam during the conceptual design stage , 2009 .

[43]  Christoph Klahn,et al.  Value-driven clustering of industrial additive manufacturing applications , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[44]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Would you buy a used car with DEA? , 1997 .

[45]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A decision model for evaluation of flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal factors , 1999 .

[47]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Context-dependent Dea with an Application to Tokyo Public Libraries , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[48]  Erich J. Schwarz,et al.  Business model patterns for 3D printer manufacturers , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[49]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A new approach for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies: DEA with double frontiers , 2009 .

[50]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[51]  Azam Ghotbuee,et al.  An empirical study based on BSC-DEA to measure the relative efficiencies of different health care centers in province of Semnan, Iran , 2012 .

[52]  D. E. Koulouriotis,et al.  Robot evaluation and selection Part A: an integrated review and annotated taxonomy , 2014 .

[53]  Reza Farzipoor Saen.  Technology selection in the presence of imprecise data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors , 2009 .