Psychoticism in the effect of prolonged exposure to gratuitous media violence on the acceptance of violence as a preferred means of conflict resolution

Abstract Within a prolonged-exposure, delayed-measurement paradigm, respondents consumed films that featured no violence, old-style violence, gratuitous violence, or horror. Both male and female respondents had been classified as low vs high in psychoticism weeks prior to consumption. Delayed measures were: (1) the acceptance of violence as a means of conflict resolution; (2) crime apprehension; (3) evaluation of police brutality; and (4) the endorsement of the death penalty for perpetrators of violent crime. Female respondents, whether low or high in psychoticism, were not appreciably affected by the consumption of any of the violent genres. Similarly, male respondents in the lower half of psychoticism were not appreciably affected. In contrast, male respondents in the upper half of psychoticism, estimated to represent half the population, were significantly affected: Consumption of gratuitous violence consistently fostered greater acceptance of violence as a means of conflict resolution. Consumption of old-style violence and horror did not. Crime apprehension was not appreciably affected by genres differing in amount and type of violence featured. Neither were evaluations of police brutality. However, respondents, especially male respondents and respondents in the upper half of psychoticism, endorsed the death penalty more strongly after gratuitous violence than after consumption of alternative genres.

[1]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Affect and cognition : the seventeenth annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition , 1982 .

[2]  Haejung Paik,et al.  The Effects of Television Violence on Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis1 , 1994 .

[3]  James B. Weaver,et al.  Exploring the links between personality and media preferences , 1991 .

[4]  J. Bryant,et al.  Responding to the screen : reception and reaction processes , 1991 .

[5]  Norbert Mundorf,et al.  Personality and movie preferences: A comparison of American and German audiences , 1993 .

[6]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Personality in the third dimension: A psychobiological approach☆ , 1989 .

[7]  Joan B. Levine,et al.  The Feminine Routine , 1976 .

[8]  L. Bresolin,et al.  Effects of media violence on children. A review of the literature. , 1989, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  E. Donnerstein,et al.  Big World, Small Screen: The Role of Television in American Society. , 1992 .

[10]  Joseph T. Klapper,et al.  The effects of mass communication , 1960 .

[11]  Jacob J. Wakshlag,et al.  Perceived vulnerability to crime, criminal victimization experience, and television viewing , 1986 .

[12]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[13]  C. Atkin,et al.  Selective exposure to televised violence , 1979 .

[14]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotional Imagery , 1979 .

[15]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[16]  D. Pearl,et al.  Television and behavior : ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties , 1982 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Television Violence and Viewer Aggression: A Reexamination of the Evidence , 1976 .

[18]  J. Freedman,et al.  Effect of television violence on aggressiveness. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Michael C. Neale,et al.  Ageing and the relation of aggression, altruism and assertiveness scales to the Eysenck personality questionnaire , 1989 .

[20]  J. Weaver.  Are “slasher” horror films sexually violent? A content analysis , 1991 .

[21]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of chronically accessible constructs in person x situation effects on person perception: it's just a matter of time. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  N. Malamuth.  Rape proclivity among males. , 1981 .

[23]  Jeffrey A. Roth,et al.  Understanding and Preventing Violence , 1992 .

[24]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Personality and curiosity about morbid and sexual events , 1986 .

[25]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[26]  James B. Weaver,et al.  Exploring the links between personality and empathic response style , 1994 .

[27]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[28]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. , 1991 .

[29]  J. Bargh.  Automatic and conscious processing of social information. , 1984 .

[30]  R. Geen.  Television and aggression: Recent developments in research and theory. , 1994 .

[31]  L. Gross,et al.  Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. , 1994 .

[32]  H. Stipp,et al.  U.S. television programming’s effects on aggressive behavior of children and adolescents , 1988 .

[33]  H. Eysenck.  Sex and Personality , 1978 .

[34]  A. Buss,et al.  The aggression questionnaire. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  A. Huston,et al.  Television violence and aggression: the debate continues. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  B. Bushman,et al.  Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  W. Wood,et al.  Effects of media violence on viewers' aggression in unconstrained social interaction. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .