Multimodality Image Registration Using an Extensible Information Metric and High Dimensional Histogramming

We extend an information metric from intermodality (2-image) registration to multimodality (multiple-image) registration so that we can simultaneously register multiple images of different modalities. And we also provide the normalized version of the extensible information metric, which has better performance in high noise situations. Compared to mutual information which can even become negative in the multiple image case, our metric can be easily and naturally extended to multiple images. After using a new technique to efficiently compute high dimensional histograms, the extensible information metric can be efficiently computed even for multiple images. To showcase the new measure, we compare the results of direct multimodality registration using high-dimensional histogramming with repeated intermodality registration. We find that registering 3 images simultaneously with the new metric is more accurate than pair-wise registration on 2D images obtained from synthetic magnetic resonance (MR) proton density (PD), MR T2 and MR T1 3D volumes from Brain Web. We perform the unbiased registration of 5 multimodality images of anatomy, CT, MR PD, T1 and T2 from Visible Human Male Data with the normalized metric and high-dimensional histogramming. Our results demonstrate the efficacy of the metrics and high-dimensional histogramming in affine, multimodality image registration.

[1]  John Andrew Lynch,et al.  MRI-SPECT image registration using multiple MR pulse sequences to examine osteoarthritis of the knee , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[2]  László Györfi,et al.  A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition , 1996, Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability.

[3]  Yannis E. Ioannidis,et al.  Selectivity Estimation Without the Attribute Value Independence Assumption , 1997, VLDB.

[4]  Computer-Assisted Intervention,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99 , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Affine image registration using a new information metric , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Guy Marchal,et al.  3D Multi-Modality Medical Image Registration Using Feature Space Clustering , 1995, CVRMed.

[9]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Improved fast gauss transform and efficient kernel density estimation , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[11]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  C. Rajski,et al.  A Metric Space of Discrete Probability Distributions , 1961, Inf. Control..

[13]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Incorporating connected region labelling into automated image registration using mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[14]  中澤 真,et al.  Devroye, L., Gyorfi, L. and Lugosi, G. : A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition, Springer (1996). , 1997 .

[15]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Multi-variate Mutual Information for Registration , 1999, MICCAI.

[16]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Local feature matching using entropic graphs , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[17]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..