Robust climate scenarios for sites with sparse observations: a two‐step bias correction approach

Observed and projected climatic changes demand for robust assessments of climate impacts on various environmental and anthropogenic systems. Empirical-statistical downscaling (ESD) methods coupled to output from climate model projections are promising tools to assess impacts at regional to local scale. ESD methods correct for common model deficiencies in accuracy (e.g. model biases) and scale (e.g. grid vs point scale). However, most ESD methods require long observational time series at the target sites, and this often restricts robust impact assessments to a small number of sites. This paper presents a method to generate robust climate model based scenarios for target sites with short and (or) sparse observational data coverage. The approach is based on the well-established quantile mapping method and incorporates two major steps: (1) climate model bias correction to the most representative station with long-term measurements and (2) spatial transfer of bias-corrected model data to represent target site characteristics. Both steps are carried out using the quantile mapping technique. The resulting output can serve as end user–tailored input for climate impact models. The method allows for multivariate and multi-model ensemble scenarios and additionally enables to approximately reconstruct data for non-measured periods. The method's applicability is validated using (1) long-term weather stations across the topographically and climatologically complex territory of Switzerland and (2) sparse data sets from Swiss permafrost research sites located in challenging conditions at high altitudes. It is shown that the two-step approach performs well and offers attractive quality, even for extreme target locations. Uncertainties, however, remain and primarily depend on (1) data availability and (2) the considered variable. The two-step approach itself involves large uncertainties when applied to short reference data sets or spatially heterogeneous variables (e.g. precipitation, wind speed). For temperature, results are promising even when using very short calibration periods.

[1]  Olle Räty,et al.  Evaluation of delta change and bias correction methods for future daily precipitation: intermodel cross-validation using ENSEMBLES simulations , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[2]  M. Déqué,et al.  Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: Model results and statistical correction according to observed values , 2007 .

[3]  C. Frei.  Interpolation of temperature in a mountainous region using nonlinear profiles and non‐Euclidean distances , 2014 .

[4]  I. Güttler,et al.  Bias correction of regional climate models tailored for hydrological modeling , 2018 .

[5]  C. Schär,et al.  Spectral representation of the annual cycle in the climate change signal , 2011 .

[6]  Douglas Maraun,et al.  Nonstationarities of regional climate model biases in European seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums , 2012 .

[7]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: The HadEX2 dataset , 2013 .

[8]  Hayley J. Fowler,et al.  Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling , 2007 .

[9]  J. V. Revadekar,et al.  Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation , 2006 .

[10]  Julien Boé,et al.  Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro‐meteorological studies , 2007 .

[11]  D. Lüthi,et al.  Physical constraints for temperature biases in climate models , 2013 .

[12]  V. Mishra,et al.  Projections of Extreme Precipitation Events in India from regional and global climate model , 2014 .

[13]  J. Christensen,et al.  A summary of the PRUDENCE model projections of changes in European climate by the end of this century , 2007 .

[14]  R. Vautard,et al.  Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble , 2014 .

[15]  D. Rapp.  Long-term climate change , 2014 .

[16]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[17]  D. Maraun.  Reply to “Comment on ‘Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue’” , 2013 .

[18]  Richard G. Jones,et al.  A Regional Climate Change Assessment Program for North America , 2009 .

[19]  J. Christensen,et al.  Overestimation of Mediterranean summer temperature projections due to model deficiencies , 2012 .

[20]  D. Maraun,et al.  Stochastic Model Output Statistics for Bias Correcting and Downscaling Precipitation Including Extremes , 2014 .

[21]  P. Pall,et al.  Projections of extreme precipitation events in regional climate simulations for Europe and the Alpine Region , 2013 .

[22]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[23]  J. Seibert,et al.  Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods , 2012 .

[24]  G. Meehl,et al.  Near-term climate change:projections and predictability , 2013 .

[25]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Models’ Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature, Minimum Temperature, and Precipitation over Australia Using Probability Density Functions , 2007 .

[26]  J. Christensen,et al.  On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation , 2008 .

[27]  S. Kotlarski,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate‐impact projections , 2013 .

[28]  N. Addor,et al.  Bias correction for hydrological impact studies – beyond the daily perspective , 2014 .

[29]  A. Gobiet,et al.  Empirical‐statistical downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate models , 2011 .

[30]  A. Gobiet,et al.  Multi-variable error correction of regional climate models , 2013, Climatic Change.

[31]  R. Knutti,et al.  Stochastic modelling of spatially and temporally consistent daily precipitation time-series over complex topography , 2014 .

[32]  M. Hoelzle,et al.  Modeled sensitivity of two alpine permafrost sites to RCM‐based climate scenarios , 2013 .

[33]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility , 2013 .

[34]  Olle Räty,et al.  Projections of daily mean temperature variability in the future: cross-validation tests with ENSEMBLES regional climate simulations , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[35]  Andreas Gobiet,et al.  Empirical-statistical downscaling and error correction of regional climate models and its impact on the climate change signal , 2012, Climatic Change.

[36]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP 3 MULTIMODEL DATASET A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2017 .

[37]  Christian Hauck,et al.  Permafrost model sensitivity to seasonal climatic changes and extreme events in mountainous regions , 2013 .

[38]  Lukas Gudmundsson,et al.  Technical Note: Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations – a comparison of methods , 2012 .

[39]  D. Easterling,et al.  Observations: Atmosphere and surface , 2013 .

[40]  G. Heinemann,et al.  Comparing precipitation bias correction methods for high-resolution regional climate simulations using COSMO-CLM , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[41]  H. Storch.  On the Use of “Inflation” in Statistical Downscaling , 1999 .

[42]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions , 2009 .

[43]  Pier Luigi Vidale,et al.  The application of Regional Climate Model output for the simulation of high-mountain permafrost scenarios , 2007 .

[44]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs , 2004 .

[45]  D. Maraun,et al.  Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user , 2010 .