Fusion of Measures for Image Segmentation Evaluation

Image segmentation is defined as the partition of an image into homogenous and meaningful constituent parts. These parts are referred to as segments. Image segmentation serves as a prerequisite step in object detection and computer vision systems. Hence, the quality of the image segmentation results has a direct impact on those systems. A lot of attention has been rendered to the development of image segmentation algorithms. However, evaluation of these algorithms has received far less attention. As a consequence, there is still no universally acceptedmeasure for comparing the performance of various segmentation algorithms, or even different parameterizations of the same algorithm. In order to develop or improve segmentation algorithms, it is crucial to evaluate the quality of their results. In Zhang et al. [1], the importance of having application-independent methods for comparing results produced by different segmentation algorithms or different parameterizations of the same algorithm is stated in terms of: The need for autonomous selection from among possible segmentations yielded by the same segmentation algorithm, the need to place a new or existing segmentation algorithm on a solid experimental and scientific ground and the need to monitor segmentations results in real time.

[1]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Rate Bounds on SSIM Index of Quantized Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Jordi Pont-Tuset,et al.  Measures and Meta-Measures for the Supervised Evaluation of Image Segmentation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Yan Zhang,et al.  On the Euclidean distance of images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Douglas Kunda,et al.  HOSUR: A Novel Measure for Evaluation of Image Segmentation Quality , 2017 .

[5]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Toward Objective Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Jianqin Zhou,et al.  On discrete cosine transform , 2011, ArXiv.

[8]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[9]  Charless C. Fowlkes,et al.  Contour Detection and Hierarchical Image Segmentation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[12]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Unsupervised segmentation of natural images via lossy data compression , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Ensemble Combination for Solving the Parameter Selection Problem in Image Segmentation , 2008, SSPR/SPR.

[14]  Tianrui Li,et al.  A Learning-Based Framework for Supervised and Unsupervised Image Segmentation Evaluation , 2014, Int. J. Image Graph..