Modeling of chemotactic steering of bacteria-based microrobot using a population-scale approach.

The bacteria-based microrobot (Bacteriobot) is one of the most effective vehicles for drug delivery systems. The bacteriobot consists of a microbead containing therapeutic drugs and bacteria as a sensor and an actuator that can target and guide the bacteriobot to its destination. Many researchers are developing bacteria-based microrobots and establishing the model. In spite of these efforts, a motility model for bacteriobots steered by chemotaxis remains elusive. Because bacterial movement is random and should be described using a stochastic model, bacterial response to the chemo-attractant is difficult to anticipate. In this research, we used a population-scale approach to overcome the main obstacle to the stochastic motion of single bacterium. Also known as Keller-Segel's equation in chemotaxis research, the population-scale approach is not new. It is a well-designed model derived from transport theory and adaptable to any chemotaxis experiment. In addition, we have considered the self-propelled Brownian motion of the bacteriobot in order to represent its stochastic properties. From this perspective, we have proposed a new numerical modelling method combining chemotaxis and Brownian motion to create a bacteriobot model steered by chemotaxis. To obtain modeling parameters, we executed motility analyses of microbeads and bacteriobots without chemotactic steering as well as chemotactic steering analysis of the bacteriobots. The resulting proposed model shows sound agreement with experimental data with a confidence level <0.01.

[1]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications , 1990 .

[2]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[3]  A. Agung Julius,et al.  Motion control of magnetized Tetrahymena pyriformis cells by a magnetic field with Model Predictive Control , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis of bacteria in glass capillary arrays. Escherichia coli, motility, microchannel plate, and light scattering. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Yeonkyung Lee,et al.  New paradigm for tumor theranostic methodology using bacteria-based microrobot , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Bahareh Behkam,et al.  Computational and experimental study of chemotaxis of an ensemble of bacteria attached to a microbead. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Bahareh Behkam,et al.  A PEG-DA microfluidic device for chemotaxis studies , 2013 .

[8]  Peter T. Cummings,et al.  Perturbation Expansion of Alt's Cell Balance Equations Reduces to Segel's One-Dimensional Equations for Shallow Chemoattractant Gradients , 1998, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[9]  M. Shuler,et al.  A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[10]  E. Barkai,et al.  No-go theorem for ergodicity and an Einstein relation. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Mingming Wu,et al.  An agarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies , 2009, Biomedical microdevices.

[12]  R. Golestanian,et al.  Designing phoretic micro- and nano-swimmers , 2007, cond-mat/0701168.

[13]  Seong Young Ko,et al.  Development of bacteria-based microrobot using biocompatible poly(ethylene glycol) , 2012, Biomedical microdevices.

[14]  L. Segel,et al.  Model for chemotaxis. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  P. K. Maini,et al.  Overview of Mathematical Approaches Used to Model Bacterial Chemotaxis II: Bacterial Populations , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[16]  M. R. Edwards,et al.  Near and far-wall effects on the three-dimensional motion of bacteria-driven microbeads , 2013 .

[17]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Harnessing bacterial power in microscale actuation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  James A. Smith,et al.  Quantification of bacterial chemotaxis in porous media using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  H. Mao,et al.  A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Bahareh Behkam,et al.  Biomanufacturing and self-propulsion dynamics of nanoscale bacteria-enabled autonomous delivery systems , 2014 .

[21]  Roseanne M. Ford,et al.  Role of chemotaxis in the transport of bacteria through saturated porous media , 2007 .

[22]  Jennifer Sturgis,et al.  Bacteria-mediated delivery of nanoparticles and cargo into cells. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[23]  M. J. Kim,et al.  Control of microfabricated structures powered by flagellated bacteria using phototaxis , 2007 .

[24]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Effect of quantity and configuration of attached bacteria on bacterial propulsion of microbeads , 2008 .

[25]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Swimming characterization of Serratia marcescens for bio-hybrid micro-robotics , 2014 .

[26]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Modeling of stochastic motion of bacteria propelled spherical microbeads , 2011 .

[27]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Modeling, control and experimental characterization of microbiorobots , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Transport models for chemotactic cell populations based on individual cell behavior , 1989 .

[29]  N. Forbes Engineering the perfect (bacterial) cancer therapy , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  Sylvain Martel,et al.  Flagellated Magnetotactic Bacteria as Controlled MRI-trackable Propulsion and Steering Systems for Medical Nanorobots Operating in the Human Microvasculature , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[31]  Seong Young Ko,et al.  Development and implementation of analysis program for Peritrichous bacteria-based nanorobot (bacteriobot) , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[32]  Oliver G. Schmidt,et al.  Development of a Sperm‐Flagella Driven Micro‐Bio‐Robot , 2013, Advanced materials.

[33]  Changyou Chen,et al.  Construction and operation of a microrobot based on magnetotactic bacteria in a microfluidic chip. , 2012, Biomicrofluidics.

[34]  Bahareh Behkam,et al.  Effect of body shape on the motile behavior of bacteria-powered swimming microrobots (BacteriaBots) , 2012, Biomedical microdevices.

[35]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Novel Methods for Analysing Bacterial Tracks Reveal Persistence in Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  High efficiency motility of bacteria-driven liposome with raft domain binding method , 2012, Biomedical microdevices.

[37]  Seong Young Ko,et al.  Selective bacterial patterning using the submerged properties of microbeads on agarose gel , 2013, Biomedical microdevices.

[38]  Mingming Wu,et al.  A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[39]  A. Libchaber,et al.  Particle diffusion in a quasi-two-dimensional bacterial bath. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[40]  M. Sitti,et al.  Chemotactic steering of bacteria propelled microbeads , 2012, Biomedical Microdevices.

[41]  S. Ko,et al.  Motility analysis of bacteria‐based microrobot (bacteriobot) using chemical gradient microchamber , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[42]  H. Berg,et al.  Moving fluid with bacterial carpets. , 2004, Biophysical journal.