Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging.

PURPOSE To determine the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed with a combined endorectal body phased-array coil for patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or suspicious free-to-total PSA ratios in whom prior transrectal ultrasonographically (US) guided biopsy findings were negative for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four patients with PSA levels greater than 4 ng/mL or free-to-total PSA ratios lower than 15% but negative biopsy findings were examined with T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T with a combined endorectal body phased-array coil. All patients underwent digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal US. Thirty-eight patients underwent repeat biopsy after MR imaging. The accuracy of MR imaging for detection of prostate cancer was assessed prospectively. Retrospectively, MR imaging findings were correlated with individual biopsy site findings. MR imaging and biopsy results were correlated by using a cross table to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). Retrospective analysis results were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis. A P value of less than.05 indicated significance (chi(2) test according to Pearson). RESULTS At prospective analysis, MR imaging had a sensitivity of 83% and a PPV of 50% for detection of prostate cancer; these values were 33% and 67%, respectively, for DRE and 33% and 57%, respectively, for transrectal US. At retrospective site-by-site analysis, MR imaging results did not correlate significantly with individual biopsy site findings (P =.126); sensitivity was 65% and PPV was 12%. CONCLUSION In this patient population, MR imaging has higher sensitivity for detection of prostate cancer than DRE or transrectal US.

[1]  S. Fosså,et al.  DNA ploidy, serum prostate specific antigen, histological grade and immunohistochemistry as predictive parameters of lymph node metastases in T1-T3/M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1995, British journal of urology.

[2]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  Contrast‐Enhanced Endorectal Coil MRI in Local Staging of Prostate Carcinoma , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  K. Badani,et al.  Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[5]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[6]  D. Gleason,et al.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. 1974. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J H Ellis,et al.  MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  P. Walsh,et al.  Prognostic factors in men with stage D1 prostate cancer: identification of patients less likely to have prolonged survival after radical prostatectomy. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[9]  F W MULSOW,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality , 2019, Health at a Glance: Europe.

[10]  R Alagappan,et al.  Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  J. McNeal Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: relationship to local and distant spread. , 1992, Human pathology.

[12]  P. Carroll,et al.  Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  Morphology of prostate cancer: the effects of multifocality on histological grade, tumor volume and capsule penetration. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[14]  M. Deimling,et al.  Combination of signal intensity measurements of lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate with MRI and serum PSA level for differentiating benign disease from prostate cancer , 2000, European Radiology.

[15]  W. Ellis,et al.  Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it? , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[16]  H. Gruber,et al.  Value of transrectal ultrasound in preoperative staging of prostate cancer. , 1999, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[17]  G. Haas,et al.  The frequency of carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the prostate in young male patients. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[18]  K. Taari,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[19]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. , 1997, Radiology.

[20]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies. , 1994, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[21]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[22]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images. , 1995, Radiology.

[23]  M. Resnick,et al.  Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality , 2000, The Prostate.

[24]  W. Catalona,et al.  Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[25]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging--clinicopathologic study. , 1999, Radiology.

[26]  V. Nicolas,et al.  MR-Tomographie des Prostatakarzinoms - Vergleich konventionelle und endorektale MRT , 1994 .