KM EVALUATION STRATEGY

This document presents the KM evaluation strategy for Dot.Kom. The KM approach taken in Dot.Kom is based on the ENRICH methodology investigating how text mining and information extraction technologies can enhance ENRICH based knowledge management and organisational learning. The KM evaluation strategy is two fold. Firstly, we will conduct tool based evaluations which are linked to various types of organisational learning theories. Secondly, we will use a lightweight technique to evaluate the effectiveness of our tools in a wider organisational context.

[1]  Steffen Staab,et al.  CREAM: creating relational metadata with a component-based, ontology-driven annotation framework , 2001, K-CAP '01.

[2]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing: Rules, types and worlds , 1988 .

[3]  Marek Hatala,et al.  A methodological approach to supporting organizational learning , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  John Domingue,et al.  Tadzebao and WebOnto: discussing, browsing, and editing ontologies on the Web , 1998 .

[5]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users , 1992, CHI.

[6]  Alison Kidd,et al.  The marks are on the knowledge worker , 1994, CHI '94.

[7]  Tamara Sumner,et al.  The high-tech toolbelt: a study of designers in the workplace , 1995, CHI '95.

[8]  Arthur Stutt,et al.  MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup , 2002, EKAW.

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[12]  Fabio Ciravegna,et al.  Adaptive Information Extraction from Text by Rule Induction and Generalisation , 2001, IJCAI.

[13]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[14]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[15]  John Seely Brown,et al.  The Social Life of Documents , 1996, First Monday.

[16]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[17]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Automatic Acquisition of Taxonomies from Text: FCA meets NLP , 2003 .

[18]  George Karypis,et al.  A Comparison of Document Clustering Techniques , 2000 .

[19]  Joseph A. Raelin,et al.  A Model of Work-Based Learning , 1997 .

[20]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[21]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .