Acoustic seabed classification: current practice and future directions

Anderson, J. T., Holliday, D. V., Kloser, R., Reid, D. G., and Simard, Y. 2008. Acoustic seabed classification: current practice and future directions. - ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1004-1011.Acoustic remote sensing of the seabed using single-beam echosounders, multibeam echosounders, and sidescan sonars combined and individually are providing technological solutions to marine-habitat mapping initiatives. We believe the science of acoustic seabed classification (ASC) is at its nascence. A comprehensive review of ASC science was undertaken by an international group of scientists under the auspices of ICES. The review was prompted by the growing need to classify and map marine ecosystems across a range of spatial scales in support of ecosystem-based science for ocean management. A review of the theory of sound-scattering from seabeds emphasizes the variety of theoretical models currently in use and the ongoing evolution of our understanding. Acoustic-signal conditioning and data quality assurance before classification using objective, repeatable procedures are important technical considerations where standardization of methods is only just beginning. The issue of temporal and spatial scales is reviewed, with emphasis on matching observational scales to those of the natural world. It is emphasized throughout that the seabed is not static but changes over multiple time-scales as a consequence of natural physical and biological processes. A summary of existing commercial ASC systems provides an introduction to existing capabilities. Verification (ground-truthing) methods are reviewed, emphasizing the difficulties of matching observational scales with acoustic-backscatter data. Survey designs for ASC explore methods that extend beyond traditional oceanographic and fisheries survey techniques. Finally, future directions for acoustic seabed classification science were identified in the key areas requiring immediate attention by the international scientific community.

[1]  W. Michaels.  Review of acoustic seabed classification systems , 2007 .

[2]  K. Rose.  WHY ARE QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND FISH POPULATIONS SO ELUSIVE , 2000 .

[3]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[4]  C. Clay,et al.  Acoustic Estimates of the Topography and Roughness Spectrum of the Sea Floor Southwest of Iberian Peninsula , 1974 .

[5]  Debrah Hamel,et al.  Coming to Terms with λιποτάξιον , 1998 .

[6]  Karen Nichols.  Coming to Terms with “Integrated Coastal Management”: Problems of Meaning and Method in a New Arena of Resource Regulation , 1999 .

[7]  D. Eggleston,et al.  The Identification, Conservation, and Management of Estuarine and Marine Nurseries for Fish and Invertebrates , 2001 .

[8]  Andrey I. Azovsky,et al.  Fractal properties of spatial distribution of intertidal benthic communities , 2000 .

[9]  Deidre Sullivan,et al.  A classification scheme for deep seafloor habitats , 1999 .

[10]  Oliver C Peppe,et al.  Monitoring environmental variability around cold-water coral reefs: the use of a benthic photolander and the potential of seafloor observatories , 2005 .

[11]  G. Fader,et al.  An overview of seabed-mapping technologies in the context of marine habitat classification , 2000 .

[12]  D. J. Dodds,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic reflectivity of the sea floor , 1980 .

[13]  D. Eggleston,et al.  Hydrodynamic decoupling of recruitment, habitat quality and adult abundance in the Caribbean spiny lobster: source–sink dynamics? , 1997 .

[14]  David G. Reid.  Report on Echo Trace Classification , 2000 .

[15]  C. K. Minns,et al.  Assessment of net change of productive capacity of fish habitats: the role of uncertainty and complexity in decision making , 2003 .

[16]  T. Lundälv,et al.  Mapping of Lophelia reefs in Norway: experiences and survey methods , 2005 .

[17]  J. Doody,et al.  Integrated Coastal Management , 2001 .

[18]  H. Bucker,et al.  Interaction of Sound with the Ocean Bottom: A Three-Year Summary. , 1978 .

[19]  J. Collie,et al.  A quantitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf-sea benthos. , 2000, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  C. Scott,et al.  Ecosystem-based management of fisheries: is science limiting? , 2006 .

[21]  John E. Nafe,et al.  PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MARINE SEDIMENTS , 1961 .

[22]  A. Stoner.  What constitutes essential nursery habitat for a marine species? A case study of habitat form and function for queen conch , 2003 .

[23]  Sean C. Mitchell,et al.  How useful is the concept of habitat? – a critique , 2005 .