Planning on CT-Based 3D Virtual Models Can Accurately Predict the Component Size for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract The ability to predict accurate sizing of the implant components for total knee arthroplasty surgery can have several benefits in the operating room, in terms of simplifying the workflow and reducing the number of required instrument trays. Planning on a three-dimensional (3D) virtual model can be used to predict size. The aim of this study was to quantify the accuracy of the surgeon-validated plan prediction on a computed tomography (CT)-based system. The clinical records of 336 cases (267 patients), operated using a CT-based patient-specific instrumentation, have been reviewed for the size of implanted components. Preoperative default planning (according to the preferences of the surgeon) and approved planning have been compared with the size of implanted components for both the femur and tibia. The prosthesis size, preplanned by the manufacturers, was modified by the surgeon during the validation process in 0.9% of cases for the femoral component and in 2.7% of cases for the tibial component. The prosthesis size, preplanned by the surgeon after the validation process, was used in 95.8% for the femur and 92.6% for the tibia. Concordance on the size of the surgeon-validated plan and the finally implanted size was perfect for both, the femoral (κ  =  0.951; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92–0.98) and the tibial component (κ  =  0.902; 95% CI: 0.86–0.94). The most frequent change of size (51%) was an increase by one size of the planned tibial component. Planning of knee arthroplasty surgery on a 3D virtual, CT-based model is useful to surgeons to help predict the size of the implants to be used in surgery. The system we have used can accurately predict the component size for both the femur and tibia. This study reflects a study of level III evidence.

[1]  P. Randelli,et al.  Significant differences between manufacturer and surgeon in the accuracy of final component size prediction with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  Raju Vaishya,et al.  Fallacies of CT based component size prediction in total knee arthroplasty - Are patient specific instruments the answer? , 2017, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[3]  M. Schotanus,et al.  Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  J. Lorkowski,et al.  Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data , 2015, BioMed research international.

[5]  J. Argenson,et al.  No Benefit of Patient-specific Instrumentation in TKA on Functional and Gait Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  F. Abat,et al.  Reliability of preoperative measurement with standardized templating in Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2013, World journal of orthopedics.

[8]  S. Fucentese,et al.  Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  J. Purtill,et al.  Accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, American journal of orthopedics.

[10]  R. Barrack,et al.  Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  B Bloch,et al.  How useful is templating for total knee replacement component sizing? , 2012, The Knee.

[12]  Robert L. Barrack,et al.  Are Patient-specific Cutting Blocks Cost-effective for Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  David Fabi,et al.  Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[14]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Value of preoperative templating for primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The journal of knee surgery.

[15]  L. Specht,et al.  A Comparison of Acetate and Digital Templating for Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  Peter M A van Ooijen,et al.  Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[17]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.