Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses

We evaluated real-time myoelectric pattern recognition control of a virtual arm by transradial amputees. Five unilateral patients performed 10 wrist and hand movements using their amputated and intact arms. In order to demonstrate the value of information from intrinsic hand muscles, this data was included in EMG recordings from the intact arm. With both arms, motions were selected in approximately 0.2 s on average, and completed in less than 1.25 s. Approximately 99% of wrist movements were completed using either arm; however, the completion rate of hand movements was significantly lower for the amputated arm (53.9% ± 14.2%) than for the intact arm ( 69.4% ± 13.1%). For the amputated arm, average classification accuracy for only 6 movements-including a single hand grasp-was 93.1% ± 4.1%, compared to 84.4% ± 7.2% for all 10 movements. Use of 6 optimally-placed electrodes only reduced this accuracy to 91.5% ± 4.9%. These results suggest that muscles in the residual forearm produce sufficient myoelectric information for real-time wrist control, but not for performing multiple hand grasps. The outcomes of this study could aid the development of a practical multifunctional myoelectric prosthesis for transradial amputees, and suggest that increased EMG information-such as made available through targeted muscle reinnervation-could improve control of these prostheses .

[1]  R N Scott Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1966, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  George N. Saridis,et al.  EMG Pattern Analysis and Classification for a Prosthetic Arm , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  T. Kuo,et al.  The application of cepstral coefficients and maximum likelihood method in EMG pattern recognition. , 1995, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[5]  S H Park,et al.  EMG pattern recognition based on artificial intelligence techniques. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  S Micera,et al.  A hybrid approach to EMG pattern analysis for classification of arm movements using statistical and fuzzy techniques. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  F. K. Lam,et al.  Fuzzy EMG classification for prosthesis control. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Limb Amputation and Limb Deficiency: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in the United States , 2002, Southern medical journal.

[10]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Continuous myoelectric control for powered prostheses using hidden Markov models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Refined myoelectric control in below-elbow amputees using artificial neural networks and a data glove. , 2005, The Journal of hand surgery.

[13]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  B. Hudgins,et al.  REAL-TIME MYOELECTRIC CONTROL IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT TO RELATE USABILITY VS. ACCURACY , 2005 .

[15]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  B Hudgins,et al.  Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  L. E. Peppard,et al.  Feature-based classification of myoelectric signals using artificial neural networks , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  Junuk Chu,et al.  A Real-Time EMG Pattern Recognition System Based on Linear-Nonlinear Feature Projection for a Multifunction Myoelectric Hand , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  S. Krishnan,et al.  Real-Time Classification of Forearm Electromyographic Signals Corresponding to User-Selected Intentional Movements for Multifunction Prosthesis Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Decoding a new neural machine interface for control of artificial limbs. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  N.V. Thakor,et al.  Towards the Control of Individual Fingers of a Prosthetic Hand Using Surface EMG Signals , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  He Huang,et al.  An Analysis of EMG Electrode Configuration for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Based Neural Machine Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  M. Swiontkowski Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms , 2010 .