Differences of Cycling Experiences and Perceptions between E-Bike and Bicycle Users in the United States

E-bikes are bicycles that provide pedal-assistance to aid people in cycling. Because of the potential of promoting sustainable transportation, more attention has been focused on the e-bike market. This paper investigates the differences of the cycling experience and perceptions between e-bike and conventional bicycle users, using samples drawn from independent bicycle dealer customers. A total of 806 respondents in the United States took the on-line survey, including 363 e-bike-owning respondents. The results show that e-bikes play a more important role in utilitarian travel, such as commuting and running errands, compared to a conventional bicycle. Conventional bicycle-owning respondents use their bicycles more for recreation and exercise. Also, e-bike owners tend to bike longer distances and take more trips per week. Both e-bike respondents and bicycle respondents stated that improved health was a key factor for cycling, while Millennials and Generation X respondents cycle to save time and improve the environment. Finally, an ordered logit model is proposed for evaluating factors that influence interest in future e-bike ownership. Travel purpose, e-bike familiarity, annual household income, and education level are statistically significant factors in the model. These findings begin to provide insight and a profile of potential new markets for e-bikes in the United States.

[1]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China , 2007 .

[2]  Alainna Thomas.  A More Sustainable Minivan? An Exploratory Study of Electric Bicycle Use by San Francisco Bay Area Families , 2016 .

[3]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research , 2016 .

[4]  William E. Moritz,et al.  Survey of North American Bicycle Commuters: Design and Aggregate Results , 1997 .

[5]  Aslak Fyhri,et al.  Effects of e-bikes on bicycle use and mode share , 2015 .

[6]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  North America's First E-Bikeshare , 2013 .

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[8]  A L Schwab,et al.  The safety of electrically assisted bicycles compared to classic bicycles. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  From e-bike to car: A study on factors influencing motorization of e-bike users across China , 2015 .

[10]  Sebastian Seebauer,et al.  Technology adoption of electric bicycles: A survey among early adopters , 2014 .

[11]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: a generation in transition? , 2016 .

[12]  Marilyn Johnson,et al.  Extending life on the bike: Electric bike use by older Australians , 2015 .

[13]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Traffic Safety for Electric Bike Riders in China , 2012 .

[14]  Yeran Sun,et al.  Investigating Impacts of Environmental Factors on the Cycling Behavior of Bicycle-Sharing Users , 2017 .

[15]  Shuguang Ji,et al.  Electric vehicles in China: emissions and health impacts. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  G. Gremion,et al.  Electric bicycles as a new active transportation modality to promote health. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  P. McCullagh.  Regression Models for Ordinal Data , 1980 .

[18]  Geoffrey Rose,et al.  E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions , 2012 .

[19]  Xiaoying Zheng,et al.  Understanding on-road practices of electric bike riders: an observational study in a developed city of China. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  K-U Schmitt,et al.  Evaluation of e-bike accidents in Switzerland. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  J. Brisswalter,et al.  The Electrically Assisted Bicycle: An Alternative Way to Promote Physical Activity , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[22]  Jianlei Fang,et al.  Related Risk Factors for Injury Severity of E-bike and Bicycle Crashes in Hefei , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  Yi-Ling Ho,et al.  Assessing carbon reduction effects toward the mode shift of green transportation system , 2016 .

[24]  Min He,et al.  Dynamics of electric bike ownership and use in Kunming, China , 2016 .

[25]  Aslak Fyhri,et al.  A push to cycling—exploring the e-bike's role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study , 2017 .

[26]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon , 2017 .

[27]  Brian Casey Langford,et al.  Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos,et al.  E-Bike Injuries: Experience from an Urban Emergency Department—A Retrospective Study from Switzerland , 2014, Emergency medicine international.

[29]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Electric Bikes in North America , 2014 .

[30]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2004, Technometrics.

[31]  Richard Williams.  Gologit2: Generalized Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables , 2005 .

[32]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Experiences of electric bicycle users in the Sacramento, California area , 2014 .

[33]  Megan S. Ryerson,et al.  Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing , 2016 .

[34]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  Comparing physical activity of pedal-assist electric bikes with walking and conventional bicycles , 2017 .

[35]  Tim Jones,et al.  Motives, perceptions and experiences of electric bicycle owners and implications for health, wellbeing and mobility , 2016 .

[36]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .