Studies of Flatness of LiFi Channel for IEEE 802.11bb

A task group named IEEE 802.11 Light Communications Amendment-Task Group “bb” (TGbb) was established in July 2018. By bringing light-fidelity (LiFi) technology into the WiFi ecosystem, LiFi can take advantage of the globally recognized WiFi brand, while also improving its capability due to the fact that LiFi does not interfere with WiFi. Early discussions in the task group focused on the physical (PHY) layer. There are two major proposals for the PHY layer. The first one is to use the existing IEEE 802.11 chipsets with LiFi analog front-ends. This is done by means of the frequency up and down-conversions and adding a DC bias. The second proposal is to redefine a whole PHY layer and optimize it by means of adopting adaptive bit loading in order to combat the low-pass filter characteristics of the non-line-of-sight wireless optical channels. Each approach has advantages in terms of the low-entry barrier to the mass market and better performance, respectively. The root question in determining the common mode PHY between the two approaches is how frequent LiFi encounters flat channels. That is, if the channel is flat, then the gain of the adaptive bit loading is not significant. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the flatness of many samples from the reference channel models defined in the TGbb. We find that the majority of the channels are flat if the signal bandwidth is 20 MHz.

[1]  Harald Haas,et al.  Area spectral efficiency performance comparison between VLC and RF femtocell networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[2]  Stefan Videv,et al.  The Impact of Solar Irradiance on Visible Light Communications , 2018, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  Volker Jungnickel,et al.  A physical model of the wireless infrared communication channel , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[4]  Harald Haas,et al.  What is LiFi? , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[5]  Liang Yin,et al.  Physical-Layer Security in Multiuser Visible Light Communication Networks , 2018, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Jeffrey B. Carruthers,et al.  Wireless infrared communications , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  Tuncer Baykas,et al.  Performance Analysis of VLC Based on 802.11ac Frame Structure , 2019, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Henrik Schulze,et al.  Frequency-Domain Simulation of the Indoor Wireless Optical Communication Channel , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  H. Haas,et al.  On the Performance of Different OFDM Based Optical Wireless Communication Systems , 2011, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[10]  Nan Chi,et al.  875-Mb/s asynchronous bi-directional 64QAM-OFDM SCM-WDM transmission over RGB-LED-based visible light communication system , 2013, 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC).

[11]  Jie Wu,et al.  An Indoor Hybrid WiFi-VLC Internet Access System , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[12]  Murat Uysal,et al.  IEEE 802.11bb reference channel models for indoor environments , 2018 .

[13]  Stefan Videv,et al.  Dynamic load balancing with handover in hybrid Li-Fi and Wi-Fi networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication (PIMRC).