Ensemble‐based air quality forecasts: A multimodel approach applied to ozone

The potential of ensemble techniques to improve ozone forecasts is investigated. Ensembles with up to 48 members (models) are generated using the modeling system Polyphemus. Members differ in their physical parameterizations, their numerical approximations, and their input data. Each model is evaluated during 4 months (summer 2001) over Europe with hundreds of stations from three ozone-monitoring networks. We found that several linear combinations of models have the potential to drastically increase the performances of model-to-data comparisons. Optimal weights associated with each model are not robust in time or space. Forecasting these weights therefore requires relevant methods, such as selection of adequate learning data sets, or specific learning algorithms. Significant performance improvements are accomplished by the resulting forecasted combinations. A decrease of about 10% of the root-mean-square error is obtained on ozone daily peaks. Ozone hourly concentrations show stronger improvements.

[1]  I. Ilyin,et al.  Co-operative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-Range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe EMEP , 2001 .

[2]  V. Mallet,et al.  Software architecture of an ideal modeling platform in air quality – A first step: Polyphemus , 2005 .

[3]  J. Lamarque,et al.  A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2 , 2001 .

[4]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Evaluation of a photochemical grid model using estimates of concentration probability density functions , 2002 .

[5]  Anne Grete Straume,et al.  A More Extensive Investigation of the Use of Ensemble Forecasts for Dispersion Model Evaluation , 2001 .

[6]  Youhua Tang,et al.  A simple method to improve ensemble‐based ozone forecasts , 2005 .

[7]  Ecmwf Newsletter,et al.  EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS , 2004 .

[8]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe , 1999 .

[9]  Willem Hundsdorfer,et al.  Numerical time integration for air pollution problems , 2002 .

[10]  Paulette Middleton,et al.  A three‐dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation , 1987 .

[11]  S. Madronich.  Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds , 1987 .

[12]  Vivien Mallet,et al.  Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR , 2004 .

[13]  Philip M. Long,et al.  Worst-case quadratic loss bounds for prediction using linear functions and gradient descent , 1996, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[14]  Matthias Beekmann,et al.  Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of a regional‐scale transport chemistry model constrained by measurements from the Atmospheric Pollution Over the Paris Area (ESQUIF) campaign , 2003 .

[15]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling , 2000 .

[16]  Paulette Middleton,et al.  Aggregation and analysis of volatile organic compound emissions for regional modeling , 1990 .

[17]  F. Kirchner,et al.  A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling , 1997 .

[18]  Robert Vet,et al.  A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models , 2003 .

[19]  Walter F. Dabberdt,et al.  Uncertainty, ensembles and air quality dispersion modeling: applications and challenges , 2000 .

[20]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over eastern North America during the summer of 2004 , 2005 .

[21]  M. Wesely.  Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models , 1989 .

[22]  I. Troen,et al.  A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation , 1986 .

[23]  W. Stockwell,et al.  The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling , 1990 .

[24]  L. Delle Monache,et al.  An ensemble air-quality forecast over western Europe during an ozone episode , 2003 .

[25]  C. M. Kishtawal,et al.  Multimodel Ensemble Forecasts for Weather and Seasonal Climate , 2000 .

[26]  V. Mallet,et al.  Uncertainty in a chemistry-transport model due to physical parameterizations and numerical approximations: An ensemble approach applied to ozone modeling , 2006 .

[27]  J. Louis.  A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere , 1979 .

[28]  Thomas T. Warner,et al.  Ensemble Simulations with Coupled Atmospheric Dynamic and Dispersion Models: Illustrating Uncertainties in Dosage Simulations , 2002 .

[29]  Willem Hundsdorfer,et al.  Numerical time integration for air pollution models , 1998 .

[30]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[31]  E. Koffi,et al.  Dispersion Modeling Using Ensemble Forecasts Compared to ETEX Measurements , 1998 .

[32]  S. Hanna,et al.  Monte carlo estimates of uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to uncertainties in input variables , 1998 .

[33]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain , 2001 .

[34]  M. Sofiev,et al.  Ensemble dispersion forecasting—Part I: concept, approach and indicators , 2004 .