Association Between the Safe Delivery App and Quality of Care and Perinatal Survival in Ethiopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE Health apps in low-income countries are emerging tools with the potential to improve quality of health care services, but few apps undergo rigorous scientific evaluation. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of the safe delivery app (SDA) on perinatal survival and on health care workers' knowledge and skills in neonatal resuscitation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In a cluster-randomized clinical trial in 5 rural districts of Ethiopia, 73 health care facilities were randomized to the mobile phone intervention or to standard care (control). From September 1, 2013, to February 1, 2015, 3601 women in active labor were included at admission and followed up until 7 days after delivery to record perinatal mortality. Knowledge and skills in neonatal resuscitation were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the intervention among 176 health care workers at the included facilities. Analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS Health care workers in intervention facilities received a smartphone with the SDA. The SDA is a training tool in emergency obstetric and neonatal care that uses visual guidance in animated videos with clinical instructions for management. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included the knowledge and clinical management of neonatal resuscitation (skills) of health care workers before the intervention and after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The analysis included 3601 women and 176 health care workers. Use of the SDA was associated with a nonsignificant lower perinatal mortality of 14 per 1000 births in intervention clusters compared with 23 per 1000 births in control clusters (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.32-1.81). The skill scores of intervention health care workers increased significantly compared with those of controls at 6 months (mean difference, 6.04; 95% CI, 4.26-7.82) and 12 months (mean difference, 8.79; 95% CI, 7.14-10.45) from baseline, corresponding to 80% and 107%, respectively, above the control level. Knowledge scores also significantly improved in the intervention compared with the control group at 6 months (mean difference, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.02-2.32) and at 12 months (mean difference, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.98-2.09), corresponding to 39% and 38%, respectively, above the control level. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The SDA was an effective method to improve and sustain the health care workers' knowledge and skills in neonatal resuscitation as long as 12 months after introduction. Perinatal mortality was nonsignificantly reduced after the intervention. The results are highly relevant in low-income countries, where quality of care is challenged by a lack of continuing education. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01945931.

[1]  A. Labrique,et al.  Evidence on feasibility and effective use of mHealth strategies by frontline health workers in developing countries: systematic review* , 2015, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[2]  Y. Ben Amor,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of a mobile health system on adherence to antenatal and postnatal care and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV programs in Kenya , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[3]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, The Lancet.

[4]  A. Labrique,et al.  Newborn health on the line: the potential mHealth applications. , 2014, JAMA.

[5]  C. Pagliari,et al.  Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low– and middle–income countries: Systematic review and meta–analysis , 2014, Journal of global health.

[6]  S. Lund,et al.  Mobile Phone Intervention Reduces Perinatal Mortality in Zanzibar: Secondary Outcomes of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  S. Lund,et al.  Mobile phones improve antenatal care attendance in Zanzibar: a cluster randomized controlled trial , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[8]  Larissa Jennings,et al.  Exploring the use of mobile phone technology for the enhancement of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV program in Nyanza, Kenya: a qualitative study , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[9]  Mark Spigt,et al.  Meeting Community Health Worker Needs for Maternal Health Care Service Delivery Using Appropriate Mobile Technologies in Ethiopia , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Neal Lesh,et al.  Using electronic technology to improve clinical care – results from a before-after cluster trial to evaluate assessment and classification of sick children according to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) protocol in Tanzania , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[11]  Garrett Mehl,et al.  mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework , 2013, Global Health: Science and Practice.

[12]  R. Mori,et al.  Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study , 2013, The Lancet.

[13]  Garrett Mehl,et al.  H_pe for mHealth: More "y" or "o" on the horizon? , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  L. Swartz,et al.  Scaling Up mHealth: Where Is the Evidence? , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[15]  J. Perlman,et al.  Newborn Mortality and Fresh Stillbirth Rates in Tanzania After Helping Babies Breathe Training , 2013, Pediatrics.

[16]  G. Piaggio,et al.  Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  S. Lund,et al.  Mobile phones as a health communication tool to improve skilled attendance at delivery in Zanzibar: a cluster‐randomised controlled trial , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  Jamie Perin,et al.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000 , 2012, The Lancet.

[19]  L. Wright,et al.  Neonatal Death in Low- to Middle-Income Countries: A Global Network Study , 2012, American Journal of Perinatology.

[20]  Arul Chib,et al.  Midwives' Cell Phone Use and Health Knowledge in Rural Communities , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[21]  Robert W Snow,et al.  The effect of mobile phone text-message reminders on Kenyan health workers' adherence to malaria treatment guidelines: a cluster randomised trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[22]  S. Massawe,et al.  Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) and post‐partum hemorrhage: a prospective intervention study in Tanzania , 2011, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[23]  S. Cousens,et al.  Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? , 2011, The Lancet.

[24]  Özge Tunçalp,et al.  National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis , 2011, The Lancet.

[25]  Steven Teerenstra,et al.  Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three‐Level Cluster Randomized Trials , 2010, Biometrics.

[26]  A. Haines,et al.  The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[27]  N. R. van den Broek,et al.  Skilled birth attendance‐lessons learnt , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  Contributions from M. Walpole The Millennium Development Goals Report , 2008 .

[29]  T. Lander,et al.  Neonatal and perinatal mortality: country, regional and global estimates. , 2006 .