Effects of convergent–divergent vortex finders on the performance of cyclone separators using computational fluid dynamics simulations

This study investigates the effect of convergent–divergent vortex finders on the performance of cyclone separators, which is measured in terms of pressure drop and collection efficiency. Six cyclone models (two with uniform diameter and four with convergent–divergent vortex finders) were numerically simulated. The numerical simulations have been carried out using the commercial computational fluid dynamics code (CFD) Fluent v15. The simulation procedure has been validated using experimental data from the published literature where a good agreement between the numerical results and the experimental data is seen. A grid independence test has been carried out by using two levels of grids for correctness of our simulation. The Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and continuity equations have been solved for the flow simulation. The Reynolds stress model is used for modeling the stress tensor and closing the RANS equations. The results show that a convergent–divergent vortex finder is capable of producing better performance (pressure drop and collection efficiency) than the uniform diameter cyclones. Only one performance parameter can be improved in uniform diameter cyclones. In comparison to the standard uniform vortex finder cyclones, the convergent–divergent vortex finder improves the pressure drop by 6% and also reduces the cut-size to 1.4 from 1.6 µm. It is further seen that decreasing the throat area or increasing only the lower diameter of the vortex finder causes the performance to degrade. This study proves that convergent–divergent instead of uniform diameter vortex finders can be used in gas cyclones for obtaining a better performance with the same geometry.

[1]  F. Kaya,et al.  Performance analysis of numerical schemes in highly swirling turbulent flows in cyclones , 2008 .

[2]  K. Elsayed,et al.  Numerical modeling of the flow field and performance in cyclones of different cone-tip diameters , 2011 .

[3]  R. Sharma,et al.  Effect of Vortex Finder Diameter on Flow Field and Collection Efficiency of Cyclone Separators , 2015 .

[4]  K. Elsayed,et al.  The effect of cyclone vortex finder dimensions on the flow pattern and performance using LES , 2013 .

[5]  H. Shalaby,et al.  Comparative study of the continuous phase flow in a cyclone separator using different turbulence models , 2005 .

[6]  M. Moraveji,et al.  Coupling of CFD and semiempirical methods for designing three-phase condensate separator: case study and experimental validation , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[7]  Ferit Ficici,et al.  The effects of vortex finder on the pressure drop in cyclone separators , 2010 .

[8]  S. Shukla,et al.  Evaluation of numerical schemes using different simulation methods for the continuous phase modeling of cyclone separators , 2011 .

[9]  Arman Raoufi,et al.  Numerical simulation and optimization of fluid flow in cyclone vortex finder , 2008 .

[10]  Mostafa Keshavarz Moraveji,et al.  3D Computational-Fluid-Dynamics Modeling of Horizontal Three-Phase Separators: An Approach for Estimating the Optimal Dimensions , 2018 .

[11]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Gas flow field and collection efficiency of cyclone separators , 2000 .

[12]  S M Fraser,et al.  Computational and experimental investigations in a cyclone dust separator , 1997 .

[13]  F. Souza,et al.  Effects of the gas outlet duct length and shape on the performance of cyclone separators , 2015 .

[14]  K. Elsayed,et al.  The effect of cyclone inlet dimensions on the flow pattern and performance , 2011 .

[15]  H. S. Kim,et al.  Characteristics of the collection efficiency for a cyclone with different vortex finder shapes , 2004 .

[16]  Cristóbal Cortés,et al.  Modeling the gas and particle flow inside cyclone separators , 2007 .