Numerical analysis of the dual actuator load test applied to fracture characterization of bonded joints

The dual actuator load test was numerically analyzed in order to assess its adequacy for fracture characterization of bonded joints under different mixed-mode loading conditions. This test enables asymmetric loading of double cantilever beam specimens, thus providing a large range of mixed-mode combinations. A new data reduction scheme based on specimen compliance, beam theory and crack equivalent concept was proposed to overcome several difficulties inherent to the test. The method assumes that the dual actuator test can be viewed as a combination of the double cantilever beam and end loaded split tests, which are used for pure modes I and II fracture characterization, respectively. A numerical analysis including a cohesive mixed-mode damage model was performed considering different mixed-mode loading conditions to evaluate the test performance. Some conclusions were drawn about the advantages and drawbacks of the test.

[1]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Analysis of crack propagation in double cantilever beam tests of multidirectional laminates , 2003 .

[2]  J. K. Spelt,et al.  Effect of crack-growth mechanism on the prediction of fracture load of adhesive joints , 1994 .

[3]  Jr. J. Crews,et al.  A Mixed-Mode Bending Apparatus for Delamination Testing , 1998 .

[4]  K. Liechti,et al.  On the use of laminated beams for the determination of pure and mixed-mode fracture properties of structural adhesives , 1988 .

[5]  M. D. de Moura,et al.  Mode II Fracture Toughness of a Brittle and a Ductile Adhesive as a Function of the Adhesive Thickness , 2010 .

[6]  Ulf Stigh,et al.  Shear behaviour of adhesive layers , 2007 .

[7]  J. M. Starbuck,et al.  Observations of Decreased Fracture Toughness for Mixed Mode Fracture Testing of Adhesively Bonded Joints , 2009 .

[8]  Ulf Stigh,et al.  Specimen proposals for mixed mode testing of adhesive layer , 2006 .

[9]  V. Tamužs,et al.  Delamination properties of translaminar-reinforced composites , 2003 .

[10]  Andreas Öchsner,et al.  Modeling of Adhesively Bonded Joints , 2008 .

[11]  J. Dear,et al.  The calculation of adhesive fracture energies from double-cantilever beam test specimens , 1991 .

[12]  John H. Crews,et al.  The mixed-mode bending method for delamination testing , 1989 .

[13]  Jr. J. Crews,et al.  Mixed-Mode Bending Method for Delamination Testing , 1990 .

[14]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  The determination of the mode II adhesive fracture resistance, GIIC, of structural adhesive joints: an effective crack length approach , 2005 .

[15]  Jan K. Spelt,et al.  Mixed-mode fracture characterization of adhesive joints , 1994 .

[16]  Bent F. Sørensen,et al.  DCB-specimen loaded with uneven bending moments , 2006 .

[17]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  Strength Predictions for Lap Joints, Especially with Composite Adherends. A Review , 1989 .

[18]  M.F.S.F. de Moura,et al.  Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading , 2008 .

[19]  José Morais,et al.  Mode II wood fracture characterization using the ELS test , 2007 .

[20]  P. Davies,et al.  Mixed mode failure criteria for a glass/epoxy composite and an adhesively bonded composite/composite joint , 2000 .

[21]  D. Dillard,et al.  Mixed mode fracture testing of adhesively bonded wood specimens using a dual actuator load frame , 2010 .