How Does The Bone Shaft Geometry Affect its Bending Properties

In this research, ten fresh specimens of sheep tibiae were provided from slaughtered animals. Whole bone specimens were loaded in three-point bending according to standard wet bone test protocols. Mechanical properties were determined and compared with the results which were obtained from two dry bone tests. The results showed that fracture bending moment and bone extrinsic stiffness had significant relations with fracture cross-section dependent parameters (i.e., cross-section area and area moment of inertia). Where, fracture energy and ultimate strength did not have such a relation with these parameters. Finite element modeling of bone shaft was made with simplified geometry (neglecting cross-section variations along bone shaft) in two steps: First, by elliptical cross-section and second, by circular cross-section, assuming linear elastic and isotropic properties for the specimens. Elastic (Young’s) modulus and fracture load, evaluated from curves obtained from tests, were applied to the finite element model and close results of maximum stress in both test specimen and first (elliptical cross-section) model showed up. There was an average difference of about 2% between ultimate strength of wet bone specimens and maximum (tensile) stress occurred in the elliptical models. However, this value for circular models was about 16%.

[1]  M. R. Eslami,et al.  Haversian cortical bone model with many radial microcracks: an elastic analytic solution. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Yuehuei H. An,et al.  Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface , 1999 .

[3]  S. Weiner,et al.  Anisotropic mechanical properties of lamellar bone using miniature cantilever bending specimens. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Daniel E Lieberman,et al.  Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry. , 2004, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  M. R. Eslami,et al.  Micromechanics fracture in osteonal cortical bone: a study of the interactions between microcrack propagation, microstructure and the material properties. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Turner Ch Measurement of the Young's modulus bending tests can be highly inaccurate. , 1993 .

[7]  J. Wark,et al.  The potential of sheep for the study of osteopenia: current status and comparison with other animal models. , 1995, Bone.

[8]  T Jämsä,et al.  Comparison of three-point bending test and peripheral quantitative computed tomography analysis in the evaluation of the strength of mouse femur and tibia. , 1998, Bone.

[9]  K. Jepsen,et al.  Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything. , 2001, Bone.

[10]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone Mechanics Handbook, 2nd Edition. - , 2003 .

[11]  C H Turner Measurement of the Young's modulus bending tests can be highly inaccurate. , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  S. Weiner,et al.  Bending and fracture of compact circumferential and osteonal lamellar bone of the baboon tibia , 2000, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  P Zioupos,et al.  Tensile fatigue in bone: are cycles-, or time to failure, or both, important? , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  J. Currey,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Bone , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  S. Cowin Bone mechanics handbook , 2001 .