A CAST-based causal analysis of the catastrophic underground pipeline gas explosion in Taiwan
暂无分享,去创建一个
Faisal Khan | Stevan Dubljevic | Wenhe Wang | Jun Yi | Li Feng | Jiang Xu
[1] Wei Wu,et al. Dynamic safety assessment of oil and gas pipeline containing internal corrosion defect using probability theory and possibility theory , 2019, Engineering Failure Analysis.
[2] Faisal Khan,et al. SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description , 2011 .
[3] Tibor Bosse,et al. Systemic approaches to incident analysis in aviation: Comparison of STAMP, agent-based modelling and institutions , 2018, Safety Science.
[4] Jens Rasmussen,et al. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .
[5] Paul M. Salmon,et al. Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP , 2012 .
[6] Jiang Xu,et al. Comparative study on vulnerability assessment for urban buried gas pipeline network based on SVM and ANN methods , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.
[7] Her-Yung Wang,et al. Case analysis of catastrophic underground pipeline gas explosion in Taiwan , 2016 .
[8] Hongyong Liu,et al. Risk propagation mechanism: Qingdao Crude Oil Leaking and Explosion case study , 2015 .
[9] Wei Liang,et al. A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model , 2015 .
[10] Kjell Ivar Øvergård,et al. A STAMP-Based Causal Analysis of the Korean Sewol Ferry Accident , 2016 .
[11] Nancy G. Leveson,et al. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events , 2010 .
[12] Mehdi Davoudi,et al. Quantitative risk assessment of sour gas transmission pipelines using CFD , 2016 .
[13] Qingsheng Wang,et al. A mathematical model of crevice corrosion for buried pipeline with disbonded coatings under cathodic protection , 2016 .
[14] Faisal Khan,et al. Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks , 2017 .
[15] Her-Yung Wang,et al. Investigation on the Key Response Factors of Action Plan in Underground Pipeline Emergency Scenario , 2016 .
[16] Z Y Han,et al. Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.
[17] Guy H. Walker,et al. Broken components versus broken systems: why it is systems not people that lose situation awareness , 2015, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[18] Susan L. Murray,et al. STAMP – Holistic system safety approach or just another risk model? , 2014 .
[19] Mingda Song,et al. Failure analysis of a natural gas pipeline , 2016 .
[20] Jiang Xu,et al. Analysis on accident-causing factors of urban buried gas pipeline network by combining DEMATEL, ISM and BN methods , 2019, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.
[21] Bo Yu,et al. Fast method for the hydraulic simulation of natural gas pipeline networks based on the divide-and-conquer approach , 2018 .
[22] Patrick Waterson,et al. Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[23] Nancy G. Leveson,et al. Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .
[24] Nancy G. Leveson,et al. Analysis of soma mine disaster using causal analysis based on systems theory (CAST) , 2018, Safety Science.