Metamodeling of Combined Discrete/Continuous Responses

Metamodels are effective for providing fast-running surrogate approximations of product or system performance. Because these approximations are generally based on continuous functions, they can provide poor fits of discontinuous response functions. Many engineering models produce functions that are only piecewise continuous, due to changes in modes of behavior or other state variables. The use of a state-selecting metamodeling approach that provides an accurate approximation for piecewise continuous responses is investigated. The proposed approach is applied to a desk lamp performance model. Three types of metamodels, quadratic polynomials, spatial correlation (kriging) models, and radial basis functions, and five types of experimental designs, full factorial designs, D-best Latin hypercube designs, fractional Latin hypercubes, Hammersley sampling sequences, and uniform designs, are compared based on three error metrics computed over the design space. The state-selecting metamodeling approach outperforms a combined metamodeling approach in this example, and radial basis functions perform well for metamodel construction.

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[2]  R. D. Veaux,et al.  Prediction intervals for neural networks via nonlinear regression , 1998 .

[3]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[4]  Serhat Yesilyurt,et al.  Bayesian-Validated Surrogates for Noisy Computer Simulations; Application to Random Media , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[6]  Art B. Owen,et al.  9 Computer experiments , 1996, Design and analysis of experiments.

[7]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Concurrent Subspace Optimization Using Design Variable Sharing in a Distributed Computing Environment , 1996 .

[8]  K. Fang,et al.  Number-theoretic methods in statistics , 1993 .

[9]  R. Barton,et al.  Factorial hypercube designs for spatial correlation regression , 1997 .

[10]  J. Kleijnen Statistical tools for simulation practitioners , 1986 .

[11]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[12]  V. Markine,et al.  Refinements in the multi-point approximation method to reduce the effects of noisy structural responses , 1996 .

[13]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Uniform Design: Theory and Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[14]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[15]  L. Watson,et al.  Trust Region Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Sequential Response Surface Approximation and Optimization , 1998 .

[16]  J. Renaud,et al.  Approximation in nonhierarchic system optimization , 1994 .

[17]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Metamodels for simulation input-output relations , 1992, WSC '92.

[18]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[19]  J. Ackermann,et al.  Analysis and Design , 1993 .

[20]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: a review , 1987 .

[21]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  Optimization methods for non-smooth or noisy objective functions in fluid design problems , 1995 .

[22]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Metamodeling: a state of the art review , 1994, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference.

[23]  Timothy M. Mauery,et al.  COMPARISON OF RESPONSE SURFACE AND KRIGING MODELS FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[24]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[25]  Geoffrey M. Laslett,et al.  Kriging and Splines: An Empirical Comparison of their Predictive Performance in Some Applications , 1994 .

[26]  T. Simpson,et al.  Efficient Pareto Frontier Exploration using Surrogate Approximations , 2000 .

[27]  Arnold J. Stromberg,et al.  Number-theoretic Methods in Statistics , 1996 .

[28]  A. Patera,et al.  ICASE Report No . 93-50 191510 IC S 2 O Years ofExcellence SURROGATES FOR NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS ; OPTIMIZATION OF EDDY-PROMOTER HEAT EXCHANGERS , 1993 .

[29]  J. -F. M. Barthelemy,et al.  Approximation concepts for optimum structural design — a review , 1993 .

[30]  William L. Goffe,et al.  SIMANN: FORTRAN module to perform Global Optimization of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing , 1992 .

[31]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[32]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[33]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  An efficient sampling technique for off-line quality control , 1997 .

[34]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Analysis and design of composite curved channel frames , 1994 .

[35]  R. L. Hardy Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces , 1971 .

[36]  J. H. Starnes,et al.  Construction of Response Surface Approximations for Design Optimization , 1998 .