Automated test system to assess reporting latency in PMUs

The accuracy of the measurements provided by a Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU), such as phasor amplitude and phase angle, frequency and rate of change of frequency (ROCOF), can be very high. Nevertheless, other factors should be considered for a proper employment of the measurement devices. In particular, sufficiently low reporting latency should be guaranteed, to ensure that the PMU measurements are made available in a fair time. Many internal and external factors affect the overall latency of the output data of a PMU connected to a phasor data concentrator (PDC). Among them, it is possible to mention the type of the measurement algorithm, the processing time and the delay due to the transmission and the communication channel. The Standard IEEE C37.118.1-2011 defines the latency pertaining directly to the PMU. This paper proposes a simple and fast method to evaluate the PMU reporting latency, considering a high number of messages at high reporting rates. The method is based on the statistic evaluation of the difference of two timestamps provided by two independent time sources. The methodology is implemented in a prototyping architecture based on a general purpose modular data acquisition platform. The characterization phase of the obtained test system is illustrated in details. The obtained results prove that the system is compliant with the definition, the observation interval and the accuracy required by the Standard IEEE C37.118.1, along with its amendment IEEE C37.118.1a. Then, the test system is used to investigate the performance of commercial PMUs with different settings. The most significant results of this study are also presented and discussed.

[1]  Kenneth E. Martin,et al.  Synchrophasor Measurements Under the IEEE Standard C37.118.1-2011 With Amendment C37.118.1a , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  Junqi Liu,et al.  A Fast and Accurate PMU Algorithm for P+M Class Measurement of Synchrophasor and Frequency , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Luigi Vanfretti,et al.  The OpenPMU Platform for Open-Source Phasor Measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  Mario Paolone,et al.  An enhanced interpolated-modulated sliding DFT for high reporting rate PMUs , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems Proceedings (AMPS).

[5]  Taskin Koçak,et al.  Smart Grid Technologies: Communication Technologies and Standards , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[6]  Alessandra Flammini,et al.  A New IED With PMU Functionalities for Electrical Substations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  James S. Thorp,et al.  IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems , 1998 .

[8]  Anjan Bose,et al.  Bandwidth and latency requirements for smart transmission grid applications , 2013, PES 2013.

[9]  Yi Hu,et al.  Deploying a large-scale PMU system for the Brazilian interconnected power system , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies.

[10]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Synchronized Phasor Measurement Applications in Power Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  A Probabilistic Risk Mitigation Model for Cyber-Attacks to PMU Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Govind Renal,et al.  Practical aspects of testing Phasor Data Concentrators for wide area monitoring systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[13]  Mario Paolone,et al.  Enhanced Interpolated-DFT for Synchrophasor Estimation in FPGAs: Theory, Implementation, and Validation of a PMU Prototype , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.