Depth resolution improvement of streak tube imaging lidar using optimal signal width

Abstract. Streak tube imaging lidar (STIL) is an active imaging system that has a high depth resolution with the use of a pulsed laser transmitter and streak tube receiver to produce three-dimensional (3-D) range images. This work investigates the optimal signal width of the lidar system, which is helpful to improve the depth resolution based on the centroid algorithm. Theoretical analysis indicates that the signal width has a significant effect on the depth resolution and the optimal signal width can be determined for a given STIL system, which is verified by both the simulation and experimental results. An indoor experiment with a planar target was carried out to validate the relation that the range error decreases first and then increases with the signal width, resulting in an optimal signal width of 8.6 pixels. Finer 3-D range images of a cartoon model were acquired by using the optimal signal width and a minimum range error of 5.5 mm was achieved in a daylight environment.

[1]  Yuan Zhao,et al.  Improvement of range accuracy of range-gating laser radar using the centroid method. , 2010, Applied optics.

[2]  G. Buller,et al.  Kilometer-range, high resolution depth imaging via 1560 nm wavelength single-photon detection. , 2013, Optics express.

[3]  Martin Laurenzis,et al.  Long-range three-dimensional active imaging with superresolution depth mapping. , 2007, Optics letters.

[4]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Research on a flash imaging lidar based on a multiple-streak tube , 2009 .

[5]  Anthony D. Gleckler.  Multiple-slit streak tube imaging lidar (MS-STIL) applications , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  田兆硕,et al.  Control and image processing for streak tube imaging lidar based on VB and MATLAB , 2014 .

[7]  Anthony D. Gleckler,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging polarimetry , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Bin Yang,et al.  Signal-to-noise performance analysis of streak tube imaging lidar systems. II. Theoretical analysis and discussion. , 2012, Applied optics.

[10]  Bedabrata Pain,et al.  CMOS active pixel sensor specific performance effects on star tracker/imager position accuracy , 2001, SPIE OPTO.

[11]  Champak Das,et al.  Developing and testing a pushbroom camera motion control system: using a lidar-based streak tube camera for studying the influence of water waves on underwater light structure detection , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[13]  Jianfeng Sun,et al.  4-D image reconstruction for Streak Tube Imaging Lidar , 2009 .

[14]  Zhuocheng Jiang,et al.  Streak image denoising and segmentation using adaptive Gaussian guided filter. , 2014, Applied optics.

[15]  A. El Gamal,et al.  CMOS image sensors , 2005, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.

[16]  Bin Yang,et al.  Signal-to-noise performance analysis of streak tube imaging lidar systems. I. Cascaded model. , 2012, Applied optics.

[17]  John W. McLean.  High-resolution 3D underwater imaging , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[18]  Yuan Zhao,et al.  Delayed range-gating super-resolution imaging lidar with high accuracy , 2012 .

[19]  Xiudong Sun,et al.  Range accuracy limitation of pulse ranging systems based on Geiger mode single-photon detectors. , 2010, Applied optics.

[20]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[21]  Adam Whiteson.  Streak Tube Modulation Transfer Functions , 1990, Optics & Photonics.

[22]  Anthony D. Gleckler,et al.  Multispectral and hyperspectral 3D imaging lidar based upon the multiple-slit streak tube imaging lidar , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[23]  Andrew J. Nevis,et al.  Advantages of three-dimensional electro-optic imaging sensors , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[24]  J. Busck,et al.  Gated viewing and high-accuracy three-dimensional laser radar. , 2004, Applied optics.

[26]  Brian C. Redman,et al.  Flash lidar based on multiple-slit streak tube imaging lidar , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.