Frontline Service Technology infusion: conceptual archetypes and future research directions

PurposeSmart technologies and connected objects are rapidly changing the organizational frontline. Yet, our understanding of how these technologies infuse service encounters remains limited. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to update existing classifications of Frontline Service Technology (FST) infusion. Moreover, the authors discuss three promising smart and connected technologies – conversational agents, extended reality (XR) and blockchain technology – and their respective implications for customers, frontline employees and service organizations.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses a conceptual approach integrating existing work on FST infusion with artificial intelligence, robotics, XR and blockchain literature, while also building on insights gathered through expert interviews and focus group conversations with members of two service research centers.FindingsThe authors define FST and propose a set of FST infusion archetypes at the organizational frontline. Additionally, the authors develop future research directions focused on understanding how conversational agents, XR and blockchain technology will impact service.Originality/valueThis paper updates and extends existing classifications of FST, while paving the road for further work on FST infusion.

[1]  Kim Willems,et al.  Can’t touch this: the impact of augmented reality versus touch and non-touch interfaces on perceived ownership , 2018, Virtual Reality.

[2]  Jun He,et al.  Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[3]  L. A. Slongo,et al.  An integration of traceability elements and their impact in consumer's trust , 2018, Food Control.

[4]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Brave new world: service robots in the frontline , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[5]  Raymond P. Fisk,et al.  Design for service inclusion: creating inclusive service systems by 2050 , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[6]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[7]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Making omnichannel an augmented reality: the current and future state of the art , 2018, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

[8]  Theo Araujo,et al.  Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Jens Nordfält,et al.  In-Store Mobile Phone Use and Customer Shopping Behavior: Evidence from the Field , 2018, Journal of Marketing.

[10]  Jaehyun Park,et al.  Virtual reality sickness questionnaire (VRSQ): Motion sickness measurement index in a virtual reality environment. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Fabrizio Lamberti,et al.  To Blockchain or Not to Blockchain: That Is the Question , 2018, IT Professional.

[12]  Emily C. Collins,et al.  The effects of robot facial emotional expressions and gender on child–robot interaction in a field study , 2018, Connect. Sci..

[13]  D. Mahr,et al.  Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks , 2018 .

[14]  W. Goldstein,et al.  Consumer Choice and Autonomy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data , 2017, Customer Needs and Solutions.

[15]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Service , 2018 .

[16]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects , 2018, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[17]  Alexander Ivanovitch Savelyev,et al.  Copyright in the Blockchain Era: Promises and Challenges , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[18]  Sven Tuzovic,et al.  Conversational Commerce – A New Era for Service Business Development? , 2018 .

[19]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Cost-effective service excellence , 2017, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[20]  Dominique Crié,et al.  I virtually try it … I want it! Virtual Fitting Room: a tool to increase on-line and off-line exploratory behaviour, patronage and purchase intentions , 2018 .

[21]  Joseph M. Woodside,et al.  Blockchain Technology Adoption Status and Strategies , 2017, Journal of International Technology and Information Management.

[22]  Kim Willems,et al.  Escaping the crowd: An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Hand Gestures and Verbal Acknowledgments Improve Human-Robot Rapport , 2017, ICSR.

[24]  Arne De Keyser,et al.  “Service Encounter 2.0”: an investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers , 2017 .

[25]  M. A. Engelhardt,et al.  Hitching Healthcare to the Chain: An Introduction to Blockchain Technology in the Healthcare Sector , 2017 .

[26]  Yves Van Vaerenbergh,et al.  Burdens of Access , 2017 .

[27]  R. Rust,et al.  Technology-driven service strategy , 2017 .

[28]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction , 2017, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[29]  Mathew B. Chylinski,et al.  Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences , 2017, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[30]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept , 2015, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[31]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions , 2017 .

[32]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Digital Marketing: A Framework, Review and Research Agenda , 2017 .

[33]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Consumer Connectivity in a Complex, Technology-enabled, and Mobile-oriented World with Smart Products , 2017 .

[34]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  The Emergent Field of Organizational Frontlines , 2017 .

[35]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto , 2017 .

[36]  Ming-Hui Huang,et al.  Getting Smart , 2017 .

[37]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance , 2017 .

[38]  Kai Spohrer,et al.  A Blockchain Research Framework , 2017, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[39]  Paul Michelman,et al.  18 The Jobs That Artificial Intelligence Will Create , 2017 .

[40]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[41]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach , 2018 .

[42]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  The Future of Frontline Research , 2016 .

[43]  Service Provider’s Experiences of Service Separation , 2016 .

[44]  Y. V. Vaerenbergh,et al.  Service Recovery: An Integrative Framework and Research Agenda , 2016 .

[45]  Taezoon Park,et al.  Types of humor that robots can play , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots' animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Mobile Shopper Marketing: Key Issues, Current Insights, and Future Research Avenues , 2016 .

[48]  D. Bowen.  The changing role of employees in service theory and practice: An interdisciplinary view , 2016 .

[49]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  A Survey of Expectations About the Role of Robots in Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[50]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Is your company ready to operate as a market , 2016 .

[51]  Ashutosh Dixit,et al.  Research framework, strategies, and applications of intelligent agent technologies (IATs) in marketing , 2015, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[52]  Shanping Li,et al.  New kid on the block: a strategic archetypes approach to understanding the Blockchain , 2016, ICIS.

[53]  M. Banusree.  MIXED REALITY , 2016 .

[54]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley , 2016, Cognition.

[55]  Umut Konuş,et al.  Multichannel customer segmentation: Does the after-sales channel matter? A replication and extension , 2015 .

[56]  A. Mattila,et al.  Wearable technology in service delivery processes: The gender-moderated technology objectification effect☆ , 2015 .

[57]  Kristina Heinonen,et al.  “Futurizing” smart service: implications for service researchers and managers , 2015 .

[58]  Mohammed Slim Ben Mimoun,et al.  A valued agent: How ECAs affect website customers' satisfaction and behaviors , 2015 .

[59]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance , 2015 .

[60]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and Challenges in Human–Robot Interaction , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[61]  Kenneth R. Evans,et al.  Effect of Customer Participation on Service Outcomes , 2015 .

[62]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[63]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context , 2015 .

[64]  Felicitas Morhart,et al.  Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale , 2013 .

[65]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Virtual training: Making reality work? , 2022 .

[66]  Joel E. Collier,et al.  How customers view self-service technologies , 2015 .

[67]  P. Venugopal,et al.  A study on consumer adoption of technology-facilitated services , 2014 .

[68]  Stefanie Paluch.  Customer expectations of remote maintenance services in the medical equipment industry , 2014 .

[69]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems , 2014, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[70]  Michael D. Giebelhausen,et al.  Touch versus Tech: When Technology Functions as a Barrier or a Benefit to Service Encounters , 2014 .

[71]  Ramón López-Cózar,et al.  A framework for the assessment of synthetic personalities according to user perception , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[72]  Y. Chang,et al.  Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives , 2014 .

[73]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[74]  Brian I. Spaid,et al.  The Meaning of Shopping Experiences Augmented By Mobile Internet Devices , 2014 .

[75]  P. Pavlou,et al.  Marketing in Computer-Mediated Environments: Research Synthesis and New Directions , 2014 .

[76]  David Griol,et al.  AN AUTOMATIC DIALOG SIMULATION TECHNIQUE TO DEVELOP AND EVALUATE INTERACTIVE CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS , 2013, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[77]  Markus Blut,et al.  Service Separation and Customer Satisfaction , 2013 .

[78]  Subhashini Ganapathy.  Design Guidelines for Mobile Augmented Reality: User Experience , 2013 .

[79]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Principles and Principals: Do Customer Stewardship and Agency Control Compete or Complement When Shaping Frontline Employee Behavior? , 2012 .

[80]  Julia Fink,et al.  Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction , 2012, ICSR.

[81]  Jan H. Schumann,et al.  Technology mediation in service delivery: A new typology and an agenda for managers and academics , 2012 .

[82]  A. Krishna,et al.  An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment and Behavior , 2011 .

[83]  Abraham G. Campbell,et al.  MiRA - Mixed Reality Agents , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[84]  Aryel Beck,et al.  Towards an Affect Space for robots to display emotional body language , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[85]  Daniel A. Guttentag.  Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism , 2010 .

[86]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Embodied Conversational Agents , 2009 .

[87]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Interactive Services: A Framework, Synthesis and Research Directions , 2009 .

[88]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Where Robots and Virtual Agents Meet , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[89]  James H. Gerlach,et al.  Consumer views of self-service technologies , 2008 .

[90]  Eli Jones,et al.  High Touch Through High Tech: The Impact of Salesperson Technology Usage on Sales Performance via Mediating Mechanisms , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[91]  Milad Alemzadeh,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Overview on State of the Art , 2008 .

[92]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Multimodal Human Computer Interaction: A Survey , 2005, ICCV-HCI.

[93]  Rohit Verma,et al.  Self‐service technology and online financial service choice , 2007 .

[94]  Craig M. Froehle,et al.  Service Personnel, Technology, and Their Interaction in Influencing Customer Satisfaction , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[95]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Multimodal Human Computer Interaction: A Survey , 2005, ICCV-HCI.

[96]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology‐mediated customer service experience , 2004 .

[97]  L. Harris,et al.  The Consequences of Dysfunctional Customer Behavior , 2003 .

[98]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[99]  L. Berry,et al.  Understanding Service Convenience , 2002 .

[100]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters , 2000 .

[101]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[102]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[103]  Pratibha A. Dabholkar,et al.  Technology-based service delivery: A classification scheme for developing marketing strategies , 1994 .

[104]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots : Concepts , Design , and Applications , 1992 .

[105]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents , 1990 .

[106]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents: , 1990 .

[107]  John A. Czepiel,et al.  A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter. , 1985 .