Simulation of maize yield in current and changed climatic conditions: Addressing modelling uncertainties and the importance of bias correction in climate model simulations

Abstract Appropriate knowledge and understanding of the impact of climatic variability on agricultural production is essential for devising an adaptation strategy. Climate change impact studies have to cope with the cascade of uncertainties that enter at different levels of modelling (e.g., emission scenario, climate model structure, impact assessment models). Our study aims at addressing these uncertainties through an ensemble probabilistic approach, which accounts for uncertainties in climate model simulations as well as parametric uncertainties in a dynamic crop model, when simulating maize ( Zea mays L.) growth and development. Simulations from eight regional climate models were used in combination with 10,000 different parameter sets from a dynamic crop model, reflecting biophysical uncertainties. Since regional climate model simulations can be subject to systematic biases, the use of such simulations to create impact assessment models can lead to unrealistic results. In the second phase of our study, we therefore determined the importance of bias correction of simulated meteorological variables prior to their use as input data in a dynamic crop model. The results revealed that using raw simulations from regional climate models to force a dynamic crop model produced unrealistic maize yield estimations, mainly because of underestimation of the intensity of daily precipitation. Corrected simulations from climate models significantly improved the quality of maize yield simulations, while a lower degree of improvement was observed in cases in which the frequency of wet days was underestimated in comparison to measured values. Using bias corrected climate model simulations in an ensemble probabilistic approach resulted in probability distributions of expected yield changes at three locations in Slovenia. Yield is expected to decrease on average between 10% and 16% in the 2050s and between 27% and 34% in the 2090s, while inter-annual variability is expected to increase compared to the control period between 1961 and 1990. Variance decomposition of the ensemble yield projections was performed in order to determine the RCM inter-model variability and crop model parameter uncertainty. The proportion of variance between RCMs increases during the 21st century, but never exceeds the inter-annual yield variability. Moreover, the parametric uncertainty of the WOFOST model can be regarded as negligible compared to RCM inter-model variability and yield inter-annual variability. A statistical emulator of the dynamic crop model was developed in order to analyze the impact on maize yield of weather variability within the growing season. It has been recognized that maize yield depends mostly on weather conditions during the period from 90 to 110 days after sowing, which coincides with the silking and tasseling period. High temperatures, low relative humidity and low rainfall during this period negatively affect maize growth, leading to a decrease in dry matter production. The analysis also revealed that precipitation during the growing season had a decisive impact on inter-annual yield variability at the selected locations.

[1]  A qualitative assessment of the sources of uncertainty in climate change impacts assessment studies , 2002 .

[2]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  ON APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS OF THE WAGENINGEN CROP MODELS , 2003 .

[3]  P. Linden,et al.  ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts - Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project , 2009 .

[4]  K. Jensen,et al.  An intercomparison of regional climate model data for hydrological impact studies in Denmark , 2010 .

[5]  C. A. van Diepen,et al.  User's guide for the WOFOST 7.1 crop growth simulation model and WOFOST Control Center 1.5. , 1998 .

[6]  Miroslav Trnka,et al.  Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions , 2004 .

[7]  Olav M. Kvalheim,et al.  Interpretation of partial least squares regression models by means of target projection and selectivity ratio plots , 2010 .

[8]  J. Barnes Impact of carbon dioxide, trace gases, and climate change on global agriculture , 1992 .

[9]  Jesper Heile Christensen,et al.  Daily and monthly temperature and precipitation statistics as performance indicators for regional climate models. , 2010 .

[10]  A. Pitman,et al.  Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Models’ Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature, Minimum Temperature, and Precipitation over Australia Using Probability Density Functions , 2007 .

[11]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Comparison of climate change scenarios generated from regional climate model experiments and statistical downscaling , 1999 .

[12]  Martin Dubrovský,et al.  Sensitivity of Ceres-Maize Yields to Statistical Structure of Daily Weather Series , 2000 .

[13]  V. VUČETIĆ,et al.  Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate , 2010, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[14]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Implications of increasing carbon dioxide and climate change for agricultural productivity and water resources , 1990 .

[15]  G. Edwards,et al.  Photosynthetic acclimation of maize to growth under elevated levels of carbon dioxide , 1999, Planta.

[16]  C. A. van Diepen,et al.  Crop production potential of rural areas within the European Communities. IV: Potential, water-limited and actual crop production , 1992 .

[17]  T. Rangel,et al.  Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change , 2009 .

[18]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe: assessing uncertainties in model projections , 2007 .

[19]  Enli Wang,et al.  Simulation of phenological development of wheat crops , 1998 .

[20]  James W. Jones,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in crop model simulations using daily bias-corrected Regional Circulation Model outputs , 2007 .

[21]  M. Yokozawa,et al.  Modelling the impacts of weather and climate variability on crop productivity over a large area: A new process-based model development, optimization, and uncertainties analysis , 2009 .

[22]  G. Beyene,et al.  Acclimation to high CO2 in maize is related to water status and dependent on leaf rank. , 2011, Plant, cell & environment.

[23]  J. Hansen,et al.  Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies , 2006 .

[24]  E. Martin,et al.  Comparison of three downscaling methods in simulating the impact of climate change on the hydrology of Mediterranean basins , 2010 .

[25]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[26]  J. Porter,et al.  Crop responses to climatic variation , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[28]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[29]  Mark A. Liniger,et al.  Can multi‐model combination really enhance the prediction skill of probabilistic ensemble forecasts? , 2007 .

[30]  C. Piani,et al.  Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe , 2010 .

[31]  James W. Jones,et al.  Potential predictability of crop yield using an ensemble climate forecast by a regional circulation model , 2008 .

[32]  S. Cluzeau,et al.  Modelling the flight activity of Apis mellifera at the hive entrance , 2004 .

[33]  Byun-Woo Lee,et al.  Assessment of rice leaf growth and nitrogen status by hyperspectral canopy reflectance and partial least square regression , 2006 .

[34]  H. Abdi Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS Regression) , 2010 .

[35]  M. Babel,et al.  Spatial disaggregation of bias-corrected GCM precipitation for improved hydrologic simulation: Ping River Basin, Thailand , 2007 .

[36]  Mikhail A. Semenov,et al.  Utility of dynamical seasonal forecasts in predicting crop yield , 2007 .

[37]  Andrej Ceglar,et al.  The simulation of phenological development in dynamic crop model: The Bayesian comparison of different methods , 2011 .

[38]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[39]  W. Briggs Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[40]  H. Abdi Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression. , 2003 .

[41]  J. Wolf,et al.  WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production. , 1989 .