RF coil considerations for short‐T2 MRI

With continuing hardware and pulse sequence advancements, modern MRI is gaining sensitivity to signals from short‐T2 1H species under practical experimental conditions. However, conventional MRI coils are typically not designed for this type of application, as they often contain proton‐rich construction materials that may contribute confounding 1H background signal during short‐T2 measurements. An example of this is shown herein. Separately, a loop‐gap style coil was used to compare different coil construction materials and configurations with respect to observed 1H background signal sizes in a small animal imaging system. Background signal sources were spatially identified and quantified in a number of different coil configurations. It was found that the type and placement of structural coil materials around the loop‐gap resonator, as well as the coil's shielding configuration, are critical determinants of the coil's background signal size. Although this study employed a loop‐gap resonator design, these findings are directly relevant to standard volume coils commonly used for MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Wilson Fong Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences , 2005 .

[3]  Michael Garwood,et al.  Fast and quiet MRI using a swept radiofrequency. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[4]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Two-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging using a spiral trajectory. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Yan Wang,et al.  Density of organic matrix of native mineralized bone measured by water‐ and fat‐suppressed proton projection MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  G M Bydder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[7]  Ara Nazarian,et al.  Water‐ and fat‐suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of rat femur bone , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  G. C. Borgia,et al.  Bone tissue and porous media: common features and differences studied by NMR relaxation. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  F. Schick,et al.  Three-Dimensional Ultrashort Echo Time Imaging of Solid Polymers on a 3-Tesla Whole-Body MRI Scanner , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[10]  M. Marjańska,et al.  Multinuclear NMR investigation of probe construction materials at 9.4T , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  J. Smith,et al.  Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics , 1949 .

[12]  M. Robson,et al.  Clinical ultrashort echo time imaging of bone and other connective tissues , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[13]  W. S. Veeman High Resolution NMR Imaging of Solids , 1994 .

[14]  V. Bykov,et al.  Comparative study of the state of water in various human tissues , 2007, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[15]  Jeffry S Nyman,et al.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  G. Bydder,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Short T 2 Components in Tissue , 2002 .

[17]  I. Silvera,et al.  Impurity proton NMR signals from common "proton-free" laboratory materials. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[18]  Bruce J. Balcom,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of rigid polymeric materials using single-point ramped imaging with T 1 enhancement (SPRITE) , 1998 .

[19]  L. Schreiner,et al.  Proton NMR spin grouping and exchange in dentin. , 1991, Biophysical journal.