qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia.

PURPOSE The qCSF method is a novel procedure for rapid measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs). It combines Bayesian adaptive inference with a trial-to-trial information gain strategy, to directly estimate four parameters defining the observer's CSF. In the present study, the suitability of the qCSF method for clinical application was examined. METHODS The qCSF method was applied to rapidly assess spatial CSFs in 10 normal and 8 amblyopic participants. The qCSF was evaluated for accuracy, precision, test-retest reliability, suitability of CSF model assumptions, and accuracy of amblyopia screening. RESULTS qCSF estimates obtained with as few as 50 trials matched those obtained with 300 Ψ trials. The precision of qCSF estimates obtained with 120 and 130 trials, in normal subjects and amblyopes, matched the precision of 300 Ψ trials. For both groups and both methods, test-retest sensitivity estimates were well matched (all R > 0.94). The qCSF model assumptions were valid for 8 of 10 normal participants and all amblyopic participants. Measures of the area under log CSF (AULCSF) and the cutoff spatial frequency (cutSF) were lower in the amblyopia group; these differences were captured within 50 qCSF trials. Amblyopia was detected at an approximately 80% correct rate in 50 trials, when a logistic regression model was used with AULCSF and cutSF as predictors. CONCLUSIONS The qCSF method is sufficiently rapid, accurate, and precise in measuring CSFs in normal and amblyopic persons. It has great potential for clinical practice.

[1]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: A mini-review , 2009, Vision Research.

[2]  M F Marmor,et al.  Effect of visual blur on contrast sensitivity. Clinical implications. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[3]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[4]  Werner Adler,et al.  Measuring contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC® 6500: influence of age and glare , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[5]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  Optimal experimental design for model discrimination. , 2009, Psychological review.

[6]  M F Marmor,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and retinal disease. , 1981, Annals of ophthalmology.

[7]  Aart C Kooijman,et al.  Relationship between contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration: Comparison of 7 contrast sensitivity tests with natural and artificial pupils in healthy eyes , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[9]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[10]  W. Swanson,et al.  Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical data , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Alan B. Cobo-Lewis,et al.  An adaptive psychophysical method for subject classification , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[14]  Marmor Mf.  Contrast sensitivity and retinal disease. , 1981 .

[15]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of trial repetition in texture discrimination , 2007, Vision Research.

[16]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The influences of visibility and anomalous integration processes on the perception of global spatial form versus motion in human amblyopia , 2005, Vision Research.

[17]  R A Applegate,et al.  Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: The quick TvC method , 2006, Vision Research.

[19]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[20]  Kazunori Miyata,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Robert J. Butera,et al.  Real-time adaptive information-theoretic optimization of neurophysiology experiments , 2006, NIPS.

[22]  D M Green,et al.  Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  M F Marmor,et al.  Contrast sensitivity versus visual acuity in retinal disease. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Adaptive Design Optimization: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Model Discrimination in Cognitive Science , 2010, Neural Computation.

[25]  S. Onal,et al.  FACT contrast sensitivity as a diagnostic tool in glaucoma , 2008, International Ophthalmology.

[26]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  R. Hess,et al.  Contour integration in anisometropic amblyopia , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  H Strasburger,et al.  Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Rapid estimation of the spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity surface , 2010 .

[30]  Dov Sagi,et al.  A link between perceptual learning, adaptation and sleep , 2006, Vision Research.

[31]  David G Hunter,et al.  Amblyopia: diagnostic and therapeutic options. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  Robert J. Butera,et al.  Sequential Optimal Design of Neurophysiology Experiments , 2009, Neural Computation.

[33]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  A comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures based on the theory of optimal experiments and Bayesian techniques: Implications for cochlear implant testing , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  V Zemon,et al.  Contrast sensitivity testing: A more complete assessment of vision , 1989, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[35]  Efficient Adaptive Sampling of the Psychometric Function by Maximizing Information Gain , 2005 .

[36]  D M Levi,et al.  Neural plasticity in adults with amblyopia. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[38]  A. Watson.  Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[39]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[40]  Michael Bach,et al.  Measuring Contrast Sensitivity Under Different Lighting Conditions: Comparison of Three Tests , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[41]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .

[43]  I. Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. , 1980, Ophthalmology.

[44]  G. Woo,et al.  A PILOT STUDY OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT OF THE CAM TREATMENT OF AMBLYOPIA , 1981, Acta ophthalmologica.

[45]  Robert Montés-Micó,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function in children: normalized notation for the assessment and diagnosis of diseases , 2001, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[46]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity and Functional Vision , 2003, International ophthalmology clinics.

[47]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[48]  Tuomas J. Lukka,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation: The next dimension , 2006 .

[49]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[50]  R A Applegate,et al.  Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[51]  Deborah Giaschi,et al.  Measurement of glare susceptibility using low-contrast letter charts. , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[52]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  R A Applegate,et al.  Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[54]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[55]  Pengjing Xu,et al.  Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with anisometropic amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[56]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Information-Theoretic Experimental Design , 2005, Neural Computation.

[57]  L. Kiorpes,et al.  Contour integration in amblyopic monkeys , 2003, Visual Neuroscience.

[58]  H Strasburger,et al.  Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  D M Levi,et al.  Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia. Practice makes better. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[60]  A J Wilkins,et al.  Impaired contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy: a new technique for rapid assessment. , 1985, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[61]  A. M. Rohaly,et al.  Modeling the contrast-sensitivity functions of older adults. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[62]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[63]  S. Onal,et al.  Assessment of spatial–contrast function and short-wavelength sensitivity deficits in patients with migraine , 2007, Eye.

[64]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[65]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Spatial attention excludes external noise at the target location. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[66]  C A Hazel,et al.  The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[67]  R. Hess.  Contrast sensitivity assessment of functional amblyopia in humans. , 1979, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[68]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Deficient responses from the lateral geniculate nucleus in humans with amblyopia , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration in strabismic amblyopia: The sufficiency of an explanation based on positional uncertainty , 1997, Vision Research.

[70]  A Bradley,et al.  A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia , 1991, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.