A new ambiguity acceptance test threshold determination method with controllable failure rate

The ambiguity acceptance test is an important quality control procedure in high precision GNSS data processing. Although the ambiguity acceptance test methods have been extensively investigated, its threshold determine method is still not well understood. Currently, the threshold is determined with the empirical approach or the fixed failure rate (FF-) approach. The empirical approach is simple but lacking in theoretical basis, while the FF-approach is theoretical rigorous but computationally demanding. Hence, the key of the threshold determination problem is how to efficiently determine the threshold in a reasonable way. In this study, a new threshold determination method named threshold function method is proposed to reduce the complexity of the FF-approach. The threshold function method simplifies the FF-approach by a modeling procedure and an approximation procedure. The modeling procedure uses a rational function model to describe the relationship between the FF-difference test threshold and the integer least-squares (ILS) success rate. The approximation procedure replaces the ILS success rate with the easy-to-calculate integer bootstrapping (IB) success rate. Corresponding modeling error and approximation error are analysed with simulation data to avoid nuisance biases and unrealistic stochastic model impact. The results indicate the proposed method can greatly simplify the FF-approach without introducing significant modeling error. The threshold function method makes the fixed failure rate threshold determination method feasible for real-time applications.

[1]  P. Teunissen Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping , 1998 .

[2]  Lei Wang,et al.  Fixed Failure Rate Ambiguity Validation Methods for GPS and Compass , 2013 .

[3]  Dennis Odijk,et al.  The Future of Single-Frequency Integer Ambiguity Resolution , 2012 .

[4]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it , 2009 .

[5]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  New Global Navigation Satellite System Ambiguity Resolution Method Compared to Existing Approaches , 2006 .

[6]  S. Verhagen On the approximation of the integer least-squares success rate: which lower or upper bound to use? , 2003 .

[7]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  Ambiguity Acceptance Testing : A Comparison of the Ratio Test and Difference Test , 2014 .

[8]  H.-J. Euler,et al.  On a Measure for the Discernibility between Different Ambiguity Solutions in the Static-Kinematic GPS-Mode , 1991 .

[9]  P. D. Jonge,et al.  The LAMBDA method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects , 1996 .

[10]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[11]  Clyde C. Goad,et al.  On optimal filtering of GPS dual frequency observations without using orbit information , 1991 .

[12]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  Ps-LAMBDA: Ambiguity success rate evaluation software for interferometric applications , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  Sandra Verhagen,et al.  On the probability density function of the GNSS ambiguity residuals , 2006 .

[14]  Shaowei Han,et al.  Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning , 1996 .

[15]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Nonlinear least squares , 1990 .

[16]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  Ming Wei,et al.  Fast Ambiguity Resolution Using an Integer Nonlinear Programming Method , 1995 .

[18]  Christian Tiberius,et al.  Integer Ambiguity Estimation with the Lambda Method , 1996 .

[19]  Herbert Landau,et al.  On-the-Fly Ambiguity Resolution for Precise Differential Positioning , 1992 .

[20]  Alexandra Verhagen,et al.  The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation , 2005 .

[21]  T. Takasu,et al.  Kalman-Filter-Based Integer Ambiguity Resolution Strategy for Long-Baseline RTK with Ionosphere and Troposphere Estimation , 2010 .

[22]  P. Teunissen The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation , 1995 .

[23]  Peter Teunissen A carrier phase ambiguity estimator with easy-to-evaluate fail-rate , 2003 .

[24]  Hasanuddin Z. Abidin,et al.  Computational and Geometrical Aspects of On-The-Fly Ambiguity Resolution , 1993 .

[25]  Peter Teunissen The parameter distributions of the integer GPS model , 2002 .

[26]  Gerhard Beutler,et al.  Rapid static positioning based on the fast ambiguity resolution approach , 1990 .

[27]  Dennis Odijk,et al.  Weighting Ionospheric Corrections to Improve Fast GPS Positioning Over Medium Distances , 2000 .

[28]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  GNSS ambiguity resolution with optimally controlled failure-rate , 2005 .

[29]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Integer aperture GNSS ambiguity resolution , 2003 .

[30]  P. Teunissen,et al.  The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[31]  Jinling Wang,et al.  A discrimination test procedure for ambiguity resolution on-the-fly , 1998 .

[32]  A. Leick GPS satellite surveying , 1990 .

[33]  Yanming Feng,et al.  Computed success rates of various carrier phase integer estimation solutions and their comparison with statistical success rates , 2011 .

[34]  P. Teunissen An optimality property of the integer least-squares estimator , 1999 .

[35]  C. C. J. M. Tiberius,et al.  FAST POSITIONING USING THE LAMBDA-METHOD , 1995 .