Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program.

OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to prospectively assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on screening outcomes in a regional mammography program. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, 27,274 consecutive screenings were performed. Radiologists' performance before CAD (n = 7,872) and with CAD (n = 19,402) was determined by annual audits. All positive biopsy results were reviewed; histopathology was reviewed and confirmed. Outcomes (recall, biopsy, and cancer detection rates) with CAD (1999, 2000) were compared with historical control data (1998). RESULTS With CAD, increases were seen in recall rate (8.1%, from 7.7% to 8.3%), biopsy rate (6.7%, from 1.4% to 1.5%), and cancer detection rate (16.1%, from 3.7 per 1,000 to 4.3 per 1,000). Detection rate of invasive cancers of 1.0 cm or less increased 164% (from 0.508 to 1.34 per 1,000 screens; p = 0.069). Detection rate of in situ cancers declined 6.7% (from 1.27 to 1.19 per 1,000; p = 0.849). In multivariable analysis of invasive cancers, early stage (stage I) was strongly associated with detection by CAD (odds ratio = 4.13, p = 0.025). Mean age at screening detection of cancer was 5.3 years younger in the CAD group than in the pre-CAD group (p = 0.060). CONCLUSION Increased detection rate, younger age at diagnosis, and significantly earlier stage of invasive cancer detection are consistent with a positive screening impact of CAD. Audit results were positive but generally not statistically significant due to sample size limitations. Our findings support the hypothesis that screening with CAD significantly improves detection of the specific cancer morphologies that CAD algorithms were designed to detect.

[1]  2–9 Computer-aided Detection With Screening Mammography in a University Hospital Setting , 2006 .

[2]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  L. Tabár,et al.  Beyond randomized controlled trials , 2001, Cancer.

[4]  An appellate court ruling and potential implications for CAD technology in the courtroom. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of vertebral compression fractures on lateral chest radiographs: preliminary results with a tool for early detection of osteoporosis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  R. Birdwell.  Impact of Computer-aided Detection in a Regional Screening Mammography ProgramCupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC (Palmetto Richland Mem Hosp, Columbia, SC; Univ of South Carolina, Columbia) AJR 185:944–950, 2005§ , 2006 .

[7]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  David Gur,et al.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography: improving performance or simply shifting the operating point? , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  L. Tabár,et al.  The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties , 2002, Cancer.

[12]  C J Vyborny,et al.  Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Breast Cancer Care: Changing Community Standards , 2004, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[14]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. , 1998, Radiology.

[15]  J. Chabriais.  Informatique et Imagerie Mdicale : une anne de transition ? , 2006 .

[16]  Maria Kallergi,et al.  Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Against the proposition. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  S. Feig.  How Does Computer-Aided Detection Influence Screening Outcomes? Are All Radiologists Aided Equally? , 2005 .

[19]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[20]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  S. Feig.  Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured? , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  R. Brem.  Computer-Aided Detection in the Mammographic Detection of Breast Cancer: Where, Why, and How With Screen-Film, Computed Radiography, and Full-Field Digital Mammography , 2006 .

[24]  Christina Ilvento,et al.  Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.