Extended structural balance theory for modeling trust in social networks

Modeling trust in very large social networks is a hard problem due to the highly noisy nature of these networks that span trust relationships from many different contexts, based on judgments of reliability, dependability and competence and the relationships vary in their level of strength. In this paper, we introduce a new extended balance theory as a foundational theory of trust in networks. Our theory preserves the distinctions between trust and distrust as suggested in the literature, but also incorporates the notion of relationship strength which can be expressed as either discrete categorical values, as pairwise comparisons or as metric distances. Our model is novel, has sound social and psychological basis, and captures the classical balance theory as a special case. We then propose a convergence model, describing how an imbalanced network evolves towards new balance and formulate the convergence problem of a social network as a Metric Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) optimization problem. Finally, we show how the convergence model can be used to predict edge signs in social networks, and justify our theory through experiments on real datasets.

[1]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Graph Drawing by Stress Majorization , 2004, GD.

[3]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[4]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Propagation of trust and distrust , 2004, WWW '04.

[5]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[7]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks , 2010, WWW '10.

[8]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[9]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Predicting Trust and Distrust in Social Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[10]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007 .

[11]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Rigorous Probabilistic Trust-Inference with Applications to Clustering , 2009, 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[12]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Impression Formation: A Focus on Others’ Intents , 2011 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  James A. Davis Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs , 1977 .

[15]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Event sequences as generators of social network evolution , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[16]  Sibel Adali,et al.  Modeling Trust Context in Networks , 2013, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science.