A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations

A morphosyntactic agreement violation during reading elicits a well-documented biphasic ERP pattern (LAN+P600). The cognitive variables that affect both the amplitude of the two components and the topography of the anterior negativity are still debated. We studied the ERP correlates of the violation of a specific agreement feature based on the phonology of the critical word. This was compared with the violation of a lexical feature, namely grammatical gender. These two features are different both in the level of representation involved in the agreement computation and in terms of their role in establishing structural relations with possible following constituents. The ERP pattern elicited by the two agreement violations showed interesting dissociations. The LAN was distributed ventrally for both types of violation, but showed a central extension for the gender violation. The P600 showed an amplitude modulation: this component was larger for phonotactic violations in its late time window (700-900 ms). The former result is indicative of a difference in the brain structures recruited for the processing of violations at different levels of representation. The P600 effect is interpreted assuming a hierarchical relation among features that forces a deeper reanalysis of the violation involving a word form property. Finally the two features elicit distinct end-of-sentence wrap-up effects, consistent with the different roles they play in the processing of the whole sentence.

[1]  Marica De Vincenzi,et al.  Differences Between the Morphology of Gender and Number: Evidence from Establishing Coreferences , 1999 .

[2]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[3]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  A Caramazza,et al.  The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[8]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[9]  Lilia Alberghina,et al.  The modular systems biology approach to investigate the control of apoptosis in Alzheimer's disease neurodegeneration , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[10]  T C Gunter,et al.  Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[11]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[12]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Albert Kim,et al.  Sentences in the Brain: Event-Related Potentials as Real-Time Reflections of Sentence Comprehension and Language Learning , 2004 .

[14]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  H. Kolk,et al.  Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.

[16]  M. Penke,et al.  How the brain processes complex words: an event-related potential study of German verb inflections. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Stem allomorphy in the Spanish mental lexicon: Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments , 2006, Brain and Language.

[19]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Gender or Genders Agreement , 2004 .

[20]  E. Hunt.  Mechanics of Verbal Ability. , 1978 .

[21]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[23]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[24]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[26]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  K. Forster,et al.  A reader's view of listening , 1987, Cognition.

[28]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word Identification in Fluent Speech , 1995 .

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[30]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Factors in Processing Gender Agreement in Hebrew: Evidence from ERPs and Eye Movements ☆ , 2001 .

[31]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  F. Rubia,et al.  Similarities and differences between phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations in Spanish: An event-related potentials study , 2003 .

[33]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  When word category information encounters morphosyntax: An ERP study , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  On Sentence Interpretation , 1999 .

[35]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[36]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[37]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[38]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Clifton,et al.  The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond , 2004 .

[40]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[42]  Celia Jakubowicz,et al.  Gender and number processing in spoken french and spanish: 2711 , 1999 .

[43]  José E. García-Albea,et al.  Identifying the Null Subject: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[44]  P. Hagoort.  Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  P Hagoort,et al.  Gender Electrified: ERP Evidence on the Syntactic Nature of Gender Processing , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  J. Goldsmith.  Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology , 1990 .

[47]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations , 2003, Brain and Language.

[48]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[49]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[50]  E. Ritter,et al.  A head-movement approach to construct-state noun phrases , 1988 .

[51]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[53]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[54]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading , 2006, Brain Research.

[55]  M. Penke,et al.  How the brain processes complex words: an ERP-study of German verb inflections , 1997 .

[56]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[57]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  R. Jackendoff.  Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[60]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation , 2006 .

[61]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: Evidence from German and Dutch , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[63]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  J. McQueen.  Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[65]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Specialized Neural Systems Underlying Representations of Sequential Movements , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[68]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[69]  H. Kolk,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences , 2006, Brain Research.