Clinical decision analysis. The hazard of using additional data.

Acquisition of laboratory data bearing on a clinical problem may make patient care worse rather than better. The hazards of obtaining new information, that go beyond the monetary costs and risks to physical well-being, are frequently not appreciated by physicians. In the complex and many-faceted practice of medicine, intuition, even when expressed by experienced clinicians, may lead to faulty judgments. Decision analysis gives a systematic exposition of clinical management, and lessens, if not eliminates, the influence of biased and unreliable intuition. With practice, most physicians could employ decision analysis to help solve moderately complicated problems at the bedside or in the office. Use of this tactic will make gaps in knowledge explicit, and may thereby stimulate investigations to ensure better clinical judgments in the future.

[1]  Arthur F. Krieg,et al.  Why are clinical laboratory tests performed? When are they valid? , 1975, JAMA.

[2]  B J McNeil,et al.  Measures of clinical efficacy. The value of case finding in hypertensive renovascular disease. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Kassirer,et al.  Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A R Feinstein,et al.  What kind of basic science for clinical medicine? , 1970, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  E L Saenger,et al.  Interpretation of radionuclide liver images: do training and experience make a difference? , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  M. Bender,et al.  An evaluation of 99mTc-sulfur colloid liver scintiscans and their usefulness in metastatic workup: a review of 1,424 studies. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  P. Griner,et al.  Use of the laboratory in a teaching hospital. Implications for patient care, education, and hospital costs. , 1971, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  G. Gorry,et al.  Decision analysis and clinical judgment. , 1973, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  D Neuhauser,et al.  What do we gain from the sixth stool guaiac? , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  L. Lusted Editorial: In the process of solution. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  L. Schneiderman,et al.  The "abnormal" screening laboratory results. Its effect on physician and patient. , 1972, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  Harvey Wolfe,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of medical decisions;: An operations research approach, , 1972 .

[13]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  G. Gorry,et al.  Decision analysis as the basis for computer-aided management of acute renal failure. , 1973, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  B J McNeil,et al.  Measures of clinical efficacy. Cost-effectiveness calculations in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive renovascular disease. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.