Challenges in Nanoscale Devices and Breakthrough

Over the past 50 years of the semiconductor industry, the size of MOSFETs has been scaled down obeying the Moore’s law: feature sizes of transistors are scaled at a rate of approximately 0.7 times every 18 months. However, as CMOS technology approaches nanoscale region, researchers face with critical technology barrier known as short channel effect. While the gate voltage fully controls the channel conduction state in an ideal MOSFET, the drain voltage begins to give more influence on the channel potential in a nanoscale MOSFET. It leads to the dependence of the threshold voltage on the channel length and width, drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL), degradation of the subthreshold swing, and punchthrough. Fig. 1 summarizes some requirements of the state-ofthe-art CMOS technology. In order to solve these issues, holding present bulk planar CMOS technology, many studies have been successfully performed down to 45 nm technology node [1], [2]. However, CMOS scaling trend in near future will not be as straightforward as it has been in the past due to fundamental material and process limits are imminent. To address challenges in nanoscale devices, recent researches are divided into four categories as below. Same structure and same materials Same structure but new materials New structure but same materials Novel device concepts This paper will focus on reviews of abovementioned topics including some excellent works performed in our research group.

[1]  H. Nayfeh,et al.  Advanced gate stacks with fully silicided (FUSI) gates and high-/spl kappa/ dielectrics: enhanced performance at reduced gate leakage , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[2]  Byung-Gook Park,et al.  100-nm n-/p-channel I-MOS using a novel self-aligned structure , 2005 .

[3]  H.-S.P. Wong,et al.  Self-aligned (top and bottom) double-gate MOSFET with a 25 nm thick silicon channel , 1997, International Electron Devices Meeting. IEDM Technical Digest.

[4]  D. Schmitt-Landsiedel,et al.  The tunneling field effect transistor (TFET) as an add-on for ultra-low-voltage analog and digital processes , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[5]  D. Hisamoto,et al.  Impact of the vertical SOI 'DELTA' structure on planar device technology , 1991 .

[6]  Chenming Hu Device challenges and opportunities , 2004, Digest of Technical Papers. 2004 Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2004..

[7]  Byung-Gook Park,et al.  30 nm self-aligned FinFET with large source/drain fan-out structure , 2003 .

[8]  Toru Tatsumi,et al.  Dual workfunction Ni-Silicide/HfSiON gate stacks by phase-controlled full-silicidation (PC-FUSI) technique for 45nm-node LSTP and LOP devices , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[9]  Byung-Gook Park,et al.  Si single-electron transistors with sidewall depletion gates and their application to dynamic single-electron transistor logic , 2001, International Electron Devices Meeting. Technical Digest (Cat. No.01CH37224).

[10]  Jeffrey Bokor,et al.  Gate length scaling and threshold voltage control of double-gate MOSFETs , 2000, International Electron Devices Meeting 2000. Technical Digest. IEDM (Cat. No.00CH37138).

[11]  J. P. Sage,et al.  A new RTD-FET logic family , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  S.G. Park,et al.  The effects of TaN thickness and strained substrate on the performance and PBTI characteristics of poly-Si/TaN/HfSiON MOSFETs , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[13]  D. Mocuta,et al.  High performance CMOS devices on SOI for 90 nm technology enhanced by RSD (raised source/drain) and thermal cycle/spacer engineering , 2003, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 2003.

[14]  Chenming Hu,et al.  Ultra-thin body PMOSFETs with selectively deposited Ge source/drain , 2001, 2001 Symposium on VLSI Technology. Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Cat. No.01 CH37184).