Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective.

Some cost-benefit considerations for a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) are discussed in relation to a hospital-wide PACS. The acquisition of plain radiography by phosphor f2p4ing plate technology (currently state of the art computed radiography), the soft copy display of the clinical history and radiological reports in association with the corresponding images, and the retrieval and simultaneous display of past with current images, are all considered to be integral to a true PACS. Cost-benefit considerations for a PACS extend far beyond the purely economic issues. More important and far reaching consequences relate to efficient data management provided by a PACS properly interfaced to hospital and radiological information systems. The hardware required to install and operate a hospital-wide PACS is now ubiquitously available and its performance has been amply demonstrated by a number of filmless hospitals. Software design and implementation is now the outstanding consideration determining the clinical and, in particular, the radiological benefit of a PACS.

[1]  H K Huang Three methods of implementing a picture archiving and communication system. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  C A Britton,et al.  Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  N H Strickland,et al.  Default display arrangements of images on PACS monitors. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  H E Rockette,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. , 1990, Radiology.

[5]  M L Giger,et al.  Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[6]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Subperiosteal resorption: effect of full-frame image compression of hand radiographs on diagnostic accuracy. , 1992, Radiology.

[7]  Dennis L. Wilson,et al.  Intelligent prefetch strategies for historical images in a large PACS , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[8]  L T Niklason,et al.  Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[9]  J.P.J. de Valk Integrated diagnostic imaging : digital PACS in medicine , 1992 .

[10]  H Nakata,et al.  Irreversible Data Compression in Chest Imaging Using Computed Radiography: An Evaluation , 1994, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[11]  D R Aberle,et al.  Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Anna K. Chacko,et al.  Clinical experience with teleradiology in the U.S. military , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Dennis L. Wilson,et al.  Architecture of a high-performance PACS based on a shared file system , 1992 .

[14]  David J. Allison,et al.  Organization of intensive therapy unit images on PACS monitors , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[15]  M. Giger,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 3. Automated detection of nodules in peripheral lung fields. , 1988, Medical physics.

[16]  D J Anderson,et al.  High-resolution computer display of portable, digital, chest radiographs of adults: suitability for primary interpretation. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  S Sakuma,et al.  Clinical evaluation of irreversible image compression: analysis of chest imaging with computed radiography. , 1990, Radiology.

[18]  M L Giger,et al.  Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats. , 1988, Radiology.

[19]  K Doi,et al.  Digital chest radiography. , 1991, Clinics in chest medicine.

[20]  G G Cox,et al.  Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. , 1990, Radiology.

[21]  F A DiBianca,et al.  The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs. , 1981, Radiology.

[22]  W D Foley,et al.  Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System. , 1986, Radiology.