The effect of camera perspective and session duration on training decision making in a serious video game

In this paper, we examine the effects of three video game variables: camera perspective (1st person versus 3rd person), session duration, and repeated play on training participants to mitigate three cognitive biases. We developed a 70 minute, 3D immersive video game for use as an experimentation test bed. One-hundred and sixty three participants either watched an instructional decision video or played one of the four versions of the game. Each participant's learning was assessed by comparing his or her post-test scores and pre-test scores for knowledge of the biases and ability to mitigate them. Results indicated that repeated game play across two sessions produced the largest improvement in learning, and was more effective than the instructional decision video and single session game for mitigating biases. Surprisingly, session duration did not improve learning, and results were mixed for the third person perspective improved learning. Overall, the video game did improve participant's ability to learn and to mitigate three cognitive biases. Implications for training using video game are discussed.

[1]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring on training in a video game , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC).

[2]  Edward Castronova,et al.  Heuristica: Designing a serious game for improving decision making , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC).

[3]  P. Todd,et al.  Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World , 2012 .

[4]  K. Squire,et al.  Games, Learning, and Society: Games as Twenty-First-Century Curriculum , 2012 .

[5]  Gary Klein,et al.  Improving Users' Mental Models of Intelligent Software Tools , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[6]  Jeanne H. Brockmyer,et al.  The Development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A Measure of Engagement in Video Game Playing: Response to Reviews , 2009, Interacting with computers.

[7]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Games, Learning and Society , 2009 .

[8]  Daniel L. King,et al.  Motivational differences in problem video game play , 2009 .

[9]  Sheng-Chin Yu,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu , 2022 .

[10]  Paul E. Lehner,et al.  Confirmation Bias in Complex Analyses , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Matthew B. Kugler,et al.  Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot , 2007 .

[13]  C S Green,et al.  Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision , 2007, Psychological science.

[14]  Ian Skurnik,et al.  Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns , 2007 .

[15]  Kristine L. Nowak,et al.  Contextual Features of Violent Video Games, Mental Models, and Aggression , 2006 .

[16]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[17]  H. O'Neil,et al.  Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature , 2005 .

[18]  L. Ross,et al.  Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[20]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[21]  Laurie N. Taylor VIDEO GAMES: PERSPECTIVE, POINT-OF-VIEW, AND IMMERSION , 2002 .

[22]  E. Daniel,et al.  A Review of Time-Shortened Courses across Disciplines , 2000 .

[23]  J. J. Donovan,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. , 1999 .

[24]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[25]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. , 1988 .

[27]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Debiasing , 1982 .

[28]  H A Simon,et al.  The theory of learning by doing. , 1979, Psychological review.

[29]  L. Ross The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[31]  A. W. Melton The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory , 1970 .

[32]  P C Wason,et al.  Reasoning about a Rule , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.