Analysis of the wavefront reconstruction error of the spot location algorithms for the Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor

Abstract. Spot location algorithms greatly influence the wavefront measurement error of the Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor. Based on numerical simulations and experiments, we compare the wavefront reconstruction error of several spot location algorithms under different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions. We solve the problem of how to select the most suitable spot location algorithm and optimal parameters under different SNR conditions, which mimic the realistic working environment of the adaptive optics system changes. We find the optimal threshold and optimal window setting rules of the center of gravity (COG), intensity weighted centroiding, and weighted center of gravity (WCOG) algorithms. The correctness of our recommendation of spot location algorithms under different SNR conditions is supported by numerical simulations and experiments. We find that when the SNR is extremely low, that is the SNR is lower than 2, the cross-correlation algorithm and the thresholding WCOG algorithm are the best choices. When the SNR is moderately low, that is the SNR ranges from 2 to 10, the best choice is the thresholding WCOG algorithm. When the SNR is high, that is, the SNR is higher than 10, the simple algorithm of thresholding COG is the best choice.

[1]  Gerard Rousset,et al.  Comparison of centroid computation algorithms in a Shack–Hartmann sensor , 2006 .

[2]  R. Noll.  Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[3]  Alice M. Nightingale,et al.  Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor image analysis: a comparison of centroiding methods and image-processing techniques , 2013 .

[4]  J Ares,et al.  Minimum variance centroid thresholding. , 2002, Optics letters.

[5]  Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Comparison of performance of some common Hartmann-Shack centroid estimation methods , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[6]  Nicolas A. Roddier.  Atmospheric wavefront simulation using Zernike polynomials , 1990 .

[7]  Liping Zhao,et al.  Adaptive thresholding and dynamic windowing method for automatic centroid detection of digital Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. , 2009, Applied optics.

[8]  K L Baker,et al.  Iteratively weighted centroiding for Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensors. , 2007, Optics express.

[9]  Lisa A. Poyneer,et al.  Scene-based wavefront sensing for remote imaging , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[10]  Wenhan Jiang,et al.  Detection error of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[11]  Erkin Sidick,et al.  Adaptive cross-correlation algorithm for extended scene Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. , 2008, Optics letters.

[12]  Lisa A Poyneer,et al.  Scene-based Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensing: analysis and simulation. , 2003, Applied optics.

[13]  Cheol-Jung Kim,et al.  A center detection algorithm for Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2007 .

[14]  Xinyang Li,et al.  Optimum parameters of image preprocessing method for Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor in different SNR condition , 2018, Other Conferences.

[15]  Chao Li,et al.  Optimization for high precision Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2009 .

[16]  Wenhan Jiang,et al.  Zernike modal wavefront reconstruction error of a Shack-Hartmann sensor in atmosphere turbulence: theory and experiment , 2002, SPIE/COS Photonics Asia.

[17]  Xinyang Li,et al.  Improvement of correlation-based centroiding methods for point source Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2018 .

[18]  Guang-ming Dai.  Modal compensation of atmospheric turbulence with the use of Zernike polynomials and Karhunen–Loève functions , 1995 .

[19]  G Rousset,et al.  Improvement of Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor measurement for extreme adaptive optics. , 2004, Optics letters.

[20]  Hongwei Ye,et al.  Large dynamic range Shack–Hartmann wavefront measurement based on image segmentation and a neighbouring-region search algorithm , 2019, Optics Communications.

[21]  Xinyang Li,et al.  Optimum threshold selection method of centroid computation for Gaussian spot , 2015, Applied Optics and Photonics China.

[22]  P Artal,et al.  Analysis of the performance of the Hartmann-Shack sensor in the human eye. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Changhui Rao,et al.  Error analysis of CCD-based point source centroid computation under the background light. , 2009, Optics express.