FINE-SCALE GENETIC STRUCTURE AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION IN FEMALE WHITE-TAILED DEER

Abstract Social behavior of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) can have important management implications. The formation of matrilineal social groups among female deer has been documented and management strategies have been proposed based on this well-developed social structure. Using radiocollared (n = 17) and hunter or vehicle-killed (n = 21) does, we examined spatial and genetic structure in white-tailed deer on a 7,000-ha portion of the Savannah River Site in the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA. We used 14 microsatellite DNA loci to calculate pairwise relatedness among individual deer and to assign doe pairs to putative relationship categories. Linear distance and genetic relatedness were weakly correlated (r = −0.08, P = 0.058). Relationship categories differed in mean spatial distance, but only 60% of first-degree-related doe pairs (full sibling or mother–offspring pairs) and 38% of second-degree-related doe pairs (half sibling, grandmother–granddaughter pairs) were members of the same social group based on spatial association. Heavy hunting pressure in this population has created a young age structure among does, where the average age is < 2.5 years, and < 4% of does are > 4.5 years old. This—combined with potentially elevated dispersal among young does—could limit the formation of persistent, cohesive social groups. Our results question the universal applicability of recently proposed models of spatial and genetic structuring in white-tailed deer, particularly in areas with differing harvest histories.

[1]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  J. Avise,et al.  BIOCHEMICAL VARIATION AND GENETIC HETEROGENEITY IN SOUTH CAROLINA DEER POPULATIONS1 , 1979 .

[3]  W. F. Porter,et al.  LOCALIZED MANAGEMENT OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN THE CENTRAL ADIRONDACK MOUNTAINS, NEW YORK , 2004 .

[4]  W. McShea,et al.  Deer management and the concept of overabundance , 1997 .

[5]  W. Dupont,et al.  Catch-effort estimation of white-tailed deer population size , 1991 .

[6]  J. Slate,et al.  Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[7]  G. Tuskan,et al.  Genetic relatedness and female spatial organization in a solitary carnivore, the raccoon, Procyon lotor , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[8]  Jocelyn L. Aycrigg,et al.  Sociospatial Dynamics of White-Tailed Deer in the Central Adirondack Mountains, New York , 1997 .

[9]  O. Hardy,et al.  spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels , 2002 .

[10]  Michael S. Blouin,et al.  DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations , 2003 .

[11]  F. Balloux,et al.  The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[12]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[13]  Stan Boutin,et al.  What is wrong with error polygons , 1991 .

[14]  Rod Peakall,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure , 1999, Heredity.

[15]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[16]  George F. Mattfeld,et al.  Seasonal movements and home ranges of white-tailed deer in the Adirondacks , 1985 .

[17]  P. Jarne,et al.  Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  L. Mech,et al.  Handbook of animal radio-tracking , 1983 .

[19]  R. Honeycutt,et al.  Evaluation of a DNA microsatellite panel useful for genetic exclusion studies in white-tailed deer , 2003 .

[20]  J. Patton,et al.  FEMALE PHILOPATRY AND EXTREME SPATIAL GENETIC HETEROGENEITY IN WHITE-TAILED DEER , 2000 .

[21]  Michael R. Conover,et al.  Monetary and intangible valuation of deer in the United States. , 1997 .

[22]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[23]  W. F. Porter,et al.  MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR, DISPERSAL, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR LOCALIZED MANAGEMENT OF DEER IN A SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[24]  C. W. Severinghaus.  Tooth Development and Wear as Criteria of Age in White-Tailed Deer , 1949 .

[25]  H. Kilpatrick,et al.  Spatial and temporal use of a suburban landscape by female white-tailed deer. , 2000 .

[26]  Robert A. Gonzales,et al.  Development of microsatellite DNA markers for the automated genetic characterization of white-tailed deer populations , 2002 .

[27]  T. Saitoh,et al.  Spatial genetic relationships in a population of the Japanese wood mouse Apodemus argenteus , 2000, Ecological Research.

[28]  G. McCracken,et al.  ON ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[30]  D. Etter,et al.  Survival of white-tailed deer in intensively farmed areas of Illinois , 2001 .

[31]  L. Mech,et al.  Deer social organization and wolf predation in Northeastern Minnesota , 1981 .

[32]  E. Wiggers,et al.  Seasonal Movements and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer Associated with an Urban Park , 2002 .

[33]  SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS OFFERS NEW INSIGHTS INTO GENE FLOW IN THE AUSTRALIAN BUSH RAT, RATTUS FUSCIPES , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  S. Casper,et al.  The plant communities , 1985 .

[35]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and the Identification of Operational Units for Conservation in Continuous Populations , 2002 .

[36]  M. E. Nelson,et al.  Development of migratory behavior in northern white-tailed deer , 1998 .

[37]  William F. Porter,et al.  Social organization in deer: Implications for localized management , 1991 .

[38]  A. Bohonak,et al.  Dispersal, Gene Flow, and Population Structure , 1999, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[39]  Effect of Social Structure on Genetic Structure of Free-Ranging White-Tailed Deer in the Adirondack Mountains , 1993 .

[40]  R. Dapson,et al.  Demographic Differences in Contiguous Populations of White-Tailed Deer , 1979 .

[41]  Further evaluation of the genetic consequences of translocations on southeastern white-tailed deer populations , 1999 .

[42]  K. Scribner,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of microgeographic genetic structure in white-tailed deer , 1997 .

[43]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  Gary C. White,et al.  Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data , 1999 .

[45]  Gino J. D'Angelo,et al.  Effects of Controlled Dog Hunting on Movements of Female White-tailed Deer , 2003 .

[46]  W. D. Klimstra,et al.  A Preliminary Study of the Social Organization of White-Tailed Deer , 1970 .

[47]  L. C. Cole,et al.  The Measurement of Interspecific Associaton , 1949 .

[48]  L. Mech,et al.  Dispersal in Female White-Tailed Deer , 1992 .

[49]  Joseph B. Sullivan,et al.  EMIGRATION AND SURVIVAL OF ORPHANED FEMALE DEER IN ILLINOIS , 1995 .