An Improved Algorithm for Reprojecting Rays through Pixel Images

It is often desired to calculate line integrals through a field of reconstructed CT density pixels for the purpose of improving CT image quality. Two algorithms widely published and discussed in the past are known to either degrade spatial resolution or generate errors in the results due to the discontinuous "square pixel" modeling of the reconstructed image. An algorithm is described, based on linear interpolation between pixels, which provides superior accuracy without unnecessary loss of resolution. It was tested on simulated data for a head section and on a narrow Gaussian density distribution. The experimental results demonstrated improved performance. The method is expected to prove useful for many types of post-reconstruction processing, including beam hardening, missing data, and noise supression algorithms.

[1]  M. Goitein Three-dimensional density reconstruction from a series of two-dimensional projections , 1972 .

[2]  B. F. Logan,et al.  The Fourier reconstruction of a head section , 1974 .

[3]  T. Budinger,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction in nuclear medicine emission imaging , 1974 .

[4]  R H Huesman,et al.  The effects of a finite number of projection angles and finite lateral sampling of projections on the propagation of statistical errors in transverse section reconstruction. , 1977, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  B. Bjärngard,et al.  Correction for beam hardening in computed tomography. , 1978, Medical physics.

[6]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Standardization of Computed Tomography Images by Means of a Material-Selective Beam Hardening Correction , 1978, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  P. Joseph,et al.  A Method for Correcting Bone Induced Artifacts in Computed Tomography Scanners , 1978, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Peter M. Joseph Image Noise And Smoothing In Computed Tomography (CT) Scanners , 1978 .

[9]  J. Kruskal,et al.  COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY: THE NEW MEDICAL X-RAY TECHNOLOGY , 1978 .

[10]  G H Glover,et al.  Aliasing: A Source of Streaks in Computed Tomograms , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  C D Stockham A simulation study of aliasing in computed tomography. , 1979, Radiology.

[12]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  Post-reconstruction method for beam hardening in computerised tomography. , 1979, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C R Crawford,et al.  ALIASING ARTIFACTS IN COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY , 1979, Applied optics.

[14]  P M Joseph,et al.  The effects of sampling on CT images. , 1980, Computerized tomography.

[15]  P. Joseph The Influence of Gantry Geometry on Aliasing and Other Geometry Dependent Errors , 1980 .

[16]  T. M. Peters Algorithms for Fast Back- and Re-Projection in Computed Tomography , 1981 .

[17]  P M Joseph,et al.  The exponential edge-gradient effect in x-ray computed tomography. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Graeme C. Mc Kinnon,et al.  Towards Imaging the Beating Heart Usefully with a Conventional CT Scanner , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  J. Verly Collimator Effects in High Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  W. R. Brody,et al.  Image Reconstruction From Limited Data , 1982, Other Conferences.

[21]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  P M Joseph,et al.  Experimental simulation evaluation of ECG-gated heart scans with a small number of views. , 1983, Medical physics.