Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations

This paper measures the technological significance of voluntary standard setting organizations (SSOs) by examining citations to patents disclosed in the standard setting process. We find that SSO patents are cited far more frequently than a set of control patents, and that SSO patents receive citations for a much longer period of time. Furthermore, we find a significant correlation between citation and the disclosure of a patent to an SSO, which may imply a marginal impact of disclosure. These results provide the first empirical look at patents disclosed to SSOs, and show that these organizations not only select important technologies, but may also play a role in establishing their significance.

[1]  Josh Lerner,et al.  A Model of Forum Shopping , 2006 .

[2]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[3]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[4]  Carl F. Cargill,et al.  Open systems standardization : a business approach , 1997 .

[5]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing the Rules for Formal Standardization , 2002 .

[6]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Is the Internet a US invention?—an economic and technological history of computer networking , 2002 .

[7]  Mark A. Lemley.  Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations , 2002 .

[8]  M. Morelli,et al.  Self Enforcing Voting in International Organizations , 2003 .

[9]  G. Anderson,et al.  The Economic Theory of Clubs , 2004 .

[10]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Identifying the Age Profile of Patent Citations , 2006 .

[11]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[12]  S. Besen,et al.  Compatibility Standards, Competition, and Innovation in the Broadcasting Industry , 1986 .

[13]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[15]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[16]  A. Leiponen.  Competing through cooperation: Standard setting in wireless telecommunications , 2006 .

[17]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Valuable Patents , 2003 .

[18]  Jerry Kaplan,et al.  Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure , 1995 .

[19]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  The role of the ITU in standardization: Pre-eminence, impotence or rubber stamp? , 1991 .

[20]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006 .

[21]  C. Shapiro.  Setting Compatibility Standards: Cooperation or Collusion? , 2000 .

[22]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[23]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Technological Choice in Voluntary Standards Committees: An Empirical Analysis. , 1990 .

[24]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[25]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[26]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[27]  Neil Gandal,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems , 1997 .

[28]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[29]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[30]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[31]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[32]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[33]  Robin Mansell,et al.  Standards, innovation and competitiveness : the politics and economics of standards in natural and technical environments , 1995 .

[34]  Marcin Strojwas,et al.  Cooperative Marketing Agreements between Competitors: Evidence from Patent Pools , 2003 .

[35]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[36]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006, American Economic Review.

[37]  M. Cave.  Changing the rules: technological change, international competition and regulation in communications , 1990 .

[38]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .