Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Trial of Passive Scattering Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose This randomized trial compared outcomes of passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) versus intensity-modulated (photon) radiotherapy (IMRT), both with concurrent chemotherapy, for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that PSPT exposes less lung tissue to radiation than IMRT and thereby reduces toxicity without compromising tumor control. The primary end points were grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis (RP) and local failure (LF). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had stage IIB to IIIB NSCLC (or stage IV NSCLC with a single brain metastasis or recurrent lung or mediastinal disease after surgery) who were candidates for concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Pairs of treatment plans for IMRT and PSPT were created for each patient. Patients were eligible for random assignment only if both plans satisfied the same prespecified dose-volume constraints for at-risk organs at the same tumor dose. Results Compared with IMRT (n = 92), PSPT (n = 57) exposed less lung tissue to doses of 5 to 10 Gy(RBE), which is the absorbed Gy dose multiplied by the relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) factor for protons; exposed more lung tissue to ≥ 20 Gy(RBE), but exposed less heart tissue at all dose levels between 5 and 80 Gy(RBE). The grade ≥ 3 RP rate for all patients was 8.1% (IMRT, 6.5%; PSPT, 10.5%); corresponding LF rates were 10.7% (all), 10.9% (IMRT), and 10.5% (PSPT). The posterior probability of IMRT being better than PSPT was 0.54. Exploratory analysis showed that the RP and LF rates at 12 months for patients enrolled before versus after the trial midpoint were 21.1% (before) versus 18.2% (after) for the IMRT group (P = .047) and 31.0% (before) versus 13.1% (after) for the PSPT group (P = .027). Conclusion PSPT did not improve dose-volume indices for lung but did for heart. No benefit was noted in RP or LF after PSPT. Improvements in both end points were observed over the course of the trial.

[1]  R. Mohan,et al.  Long-term clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: the MD Anderson experience. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Significant reduction of normal tissue dose by proton radiotherapy compared with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Stage I or Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Bengt Glimelius,et al.  Proton beam therapy - do we need the randomised trials and can we do them? , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Xiaoning Pan,et al.  A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[6]  J. Cox,et al.  Should randomized clinical trials be required for proton radiotherapy? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Z. Liao,et al.  Damage and morbidity from pneumonitis after irradiation of partial volumes of mouse lung. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Thomas Guerrero,et al.  Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  W. Curran,et al.  Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Søren M Bentzen,et al.  Randomized controlled trials in health technology assessment: overkill or overdue? , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  G. Yin,et al.  Worth Adapting? Revisiting the Usefulness of Outcome-Adaptive Randomization , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Proton Beams to Replace Photon Beams in Radical Dose Treatments , 2003, Acta oncologica.

[14]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Early findings on toxicity of proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2011, Cancer.

[15]  Laura E. Bothwell,et al.  The Emergence of the Randomized, Controlled Trial. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Mohan,et al.  Predicting pneumonitis risk: a dosimetric alternative to mean lung dose. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  R. Mohan,et al.  Dose-volume thresholds and smoking status for the risk of treatment-related pneumonitis in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Initial evaluation of treatment-related pneumonitis in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Zhongxing Liao,et al.  Analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  M. Martel,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.