Integrating the 3 Pillars of the 2011 Naples Forum on Service: S-D logic, Network & Systems Theory and Service Science

New approaches to service and marketing have been brewing for the past four decades challenging the 1960s marketing management and marketing mix (which were once a challenge to microeconomic theory focused solely on price). The new approaches included service marketing and management, relationship marketing and CRM (Customer Relationship Management), and relational and network applications in B2B (business-to-business) marketing. But we were left with a fragmented and confusing view. Service research had been growing worldwide, but after a few decades of pioneering contributions we felt that it had reached a state of complacency. The focus was on the past with a backpack of intersubjectively approved but often doubtful assumptions. The disciplines of business and management had reached a turning point calling for more systemic and integrative theory with scholars who dare address real world complexity with adequate methodology. In the 2000s service has become the unifying concept for a new way of perceiving not only business but also the role of governments. The new millennium began well by presenting new approaches: service-dominant (S-D) logic, service science, and the more general theories many-to-many marketing and the Viable Systems Approach (VSA) based on a systemic view and relationships, networks and interaction. These recognize the weaknesses of the mainstream service research and offer new conceptualization. They open up for complexity, context, interdependencies, and theory generation. Some of this was already there but it had been held back in the literature and at conferences. We now refer to the foundation of service theory as the 3 Pillars of Service.

[1]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[2]  Evert Gummesson Extending the New Dominant Logic: From Customer Centricity to Balanced Centricity. , 2008 .

[3]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective , 2008 .

[4]  R. Lusch REFRAMING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A SERVICE‐DOMINANT LOGIC PERSPECTIVE , 2011 .

[5]  F. Capra The Web of Life , 1996 .

[6]  Demetris Vrontis,et al.  Managerial and Entrepreneurial Developments in the Mediterranean Area , 2010 .

[7]  Francesco Polese,et al.  B2B is Not an Island , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[9]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[10]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[11]  Clara Bassano,et al.  A VSA-SS Approach to Healthcare Service Systems: The Triple Target of Efficiency, Effectiveness and Sustainability , 2010 .

[12]  E. Gummesson Practical value of adequate marketing management theory , 2002 .

[13]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Industrial marketing: An organizational problem? , 1975 .

[14]  Suvi Nenonen,et al.  Customer relationships and the heterogeneity of firm performance , 2009 .

[15]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[16]  Sergio Barile,et al.  S-DL, VSA and SS–Highlighting Convergences , 2010 .

[17]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Key Dimensions of Service Systems in Value-Creating Networks , 2011, The Science of Service Systems.

[18]  Fritjof Capra,et al.  The Hidden Connections , 2002 .

[19]  Jaqueline Pels,et al.  Do we really understand business marketing?Getting beyond the RM and BM matrimony , 2009 .

[20]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Fundamentals of service science , 2008 .

[21]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service, value networks and learning , 2010 .

[22]  Marialuisa Saviano,et al.  Decision-Making Under Complexity. The Case of District SME , 2009 .

[23]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[24]  BarileSergio,et al.  Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems , 2010 .

[25]  Evert Gummesson,et al.  Total Relationship Marketing , 1999 .

[26]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic , 2007 .

[27]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations , 2010 .

[28]  Harold F. Koenig,et al.  The Effect of Social Networks on Resource Access and Business Start-ups , 2002 .

[29]  Mauro Gatti,et al.  The firm as a viable system: managing inter-organisational relationships , 2011 .

[30]  Francesco Polese,et al.  A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications , 2010 .

[31]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[32]  Gaetano M. Golinelli,et al.  L’approccio sistemico vitale: nuovi orizzonti di ricerca per il governo dell’impresa , 2013 .

[33]  斎藤 優,et al.  Hakan Hakansson, edited, Industrial Technological Development : A Network Approach, pp234, Croom Helm (1987) , 1987 .

[34]  H. Håkansson,et al.  No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy , 1989 .

[35]  Cristina Mele,et al.  Co‐creating value innovation through resource integration , 2010 .

[36]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[37]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions , 2006 .

[38]  E. Gummesson Exit Services Marketing – Enter Service Marketing , 2007 .

[39]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation , 2006, CACM.

[40]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements , 2006 .

[41]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2009, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..