Investment assessment in co-generation with biomass in the presence of uncertainty and flexibility

This work deals with generation expansion from biomass co-generation. A methodology to assess investment decisions, based on cash flow analysis and financial tools, is presented. In order to incorporate the investor risk aversion criterion, a measure of risk given by the probability of obtaining negative cash flows net present values, is employed. Main uncertainties that influence cash flows are taken into account by Monte Carlo simulation and managerial flexibilities given by investment alternatives are compared employing a Real Options approach. Moreover, in order to illustrate the proposed methodology, the paper presents an analysis of the investments opportunities in the Brazilian power market for co-generation from sugar cane bagasse.

[1]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[2]  A. Dixit,et al.  Chapter 19 – The Options Approach to Capital Investment , 1998 .

[3]  A. Hacura,et al.  Risk analysis in investment appraisal based on the Monte Carlo simulation technique , 2001 .

[4]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[5]  Marion A. Brach Real Options in Practice , 2002 .

[6]  G. Friedl Copeland, Tom/Antikarov, Vladimir, Real Options. A Practitioner’s Guide, Texere LLC, New York 2001, $ 59,95 , 2002 .

[7]  R. Masiello,et al.  Managing market risk in energy , 2003 .

[8]  W. Yu,et al.  Application of Markov chain models for short term generation assets valuation , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[9]  A. Botterud,et al.  Optimal investments in power generation under centralized and decentralized decision making , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  B. Ramanathan,et al.  Analysis of Transmission Investments using Real Options , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[11]  Chung-Hsiao Wang,et al.  Electric power generation planning for interrelated projects: a real options approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Modeling Risk: Applying Monte Carlo Simulation, Real Options Analysis, Forecasting, and Optimization Techniques , 2006 .

[13]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Investment criteria for the selection of cogeneration plants¿a state of the art review , 2006 .

[14]  Aswath Damodaran,et al.  Strategic Risk Taking: A Framework for Risk Management , 2007 .

[15]  Afzal S. Siddiqui,et al.  Investment and Upgrade in Distributed Generation under Uncertainty , 2009 .