The Influence of Computer‐based Model's Race and Gender on Female Students' Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Engineering

Background This study explored the use of interface agents, anthropomorphic, 3D-animated computer characters that provide teaching or mentoring within a computer-based learning environment, to encourage young Black and White women to pursue careers in engineering. Purpose (Hypothesis) We hypothesized that computer-based models that matched young women in terms of their race and gender would be the most effective in positively influencing their interest, self-efficacy, and stereotypes about engineering. Design/Method Eighty African American undergraduate female students in Experiment 1, and 39 White undergraduate female students in Experiment 2 interacted with a computer-based agent that provided a narrative designed to encourage them to pursue engineering careers. The study employed a 2 × 2 between subjects factorial design (agent gender: male vs. female and agent race: Black vs. White). Results Across both studies we found that race and gender influenced the effectiveness of the agent for several key outcome measures. Computer-based agents who matched the participants with respect to race and gender tended to be the most effective in improving the women's responses to engineering-related fields. Nevertheless, the White male agent was actually significantly more influential than the White female agent for female Black participants. Conclusions Personalizing interface agent characteristics to match the target population can increase the effectiveness of a persuasive message to encourage young women to pursue engineering. Such an approach may contribute to the growth and inclusiveness of fields such as engineering.

[1]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[2]  S. Chaiken Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. , 1979 .

[3]  William Allen,et al.  The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness , 1953 .

[4]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[5]  D. Shen,et al.  Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐Efficacy , 2009 .

[6]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .

[7]  鈴木 聡 Media Equation 研究の背景と動向 , 2011 .

[8]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students' attitudes and beliefs , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[10]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[12]  Lily Shashaani Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and Use among College Students , 1997 .

[13]  Soyoung Kim,et al.  Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  C. G. Lord,et al.  Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements , 2003 .

[15]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[16]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[17]  Gail D. Heyman,et al.  GENDER AND ACHIEVEMENT-RELATED BELIEFS AMONG ENGINEERING STUDENTS , 2002 .

[18]  Marion Hersh,et al.  The Changing Position of Women in Engineering , 2000 .

[19]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. , 1973 .

[20]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. , 1990 .

[21]  W. Jay Hughes Gender Attributions of Science and Academic Attributes: An Examination of Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, and Technology Majors. , 2002 .

[22]  Julie Martin Trenor,et al.  The Relations of Ethnicity to Female Engineering Students' Educational Experiences and College and Career Plans in an Ethnically Diverse Learning Environment , 2008 .

[23]  R. Vatter Women in the labor force. , 1994, Statistical bulletin.

[24]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Women and science: The snark syndrome , 1998 .

[25]  J. Eccles Gender Roles and Women's Achievement-Related Decisions , 1987 .

[26]  T. Hanawa Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering , 1990 .

[27]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[29]  D. Schunk reflecting positive , 2022 .

[30]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[31]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  D. Schunk,et al.  Peer-Model Attributes and Children's Achievement Behaviors , 1987 .

[33]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes , 2004 .

[34]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices , 1994 .

[35]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[36]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[37]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[38]  Phillip Atiba Goff,et al.  Clearing the air: the effect of experimenter race on target's test performance and subjective experience. , 2005, The British journal of social psychology.

[39]  R. Moreno,et al.  Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity , 2006 .

[40]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[41]  A. L. Baylor Expanding preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents , 2002 .

[42]  Irene F. Goodman Final Report of The Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project. Executive Summary. , 2002 .

[43]  T. Mussweiler Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[44]  C. Atman,et al.  Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross‐Institutional Study * , 2001 .

[45]  L. Grant,et al.  Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Work Place Culture. , 1993 .

[46]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Factors Influencing the Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students , 2006 .

[47]  R. Lippa Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[49]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001 .

[50]  Marion A. Hersh,et al.  The changing position of women in engineering worldwide , 1998, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[51]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[52]  R. Atkinson Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. , 2002 .

[53]  Sandra Ingram,et al.  Career and Mentor Satisfaction among Canadian Engineers: Are there Differences based on Gender and Company‐Specific Undergraduate Work Experiences? , 2009 .