Describing Team Work with Activity Theory

Abstract:The proposal that activity theory might serve as a model or theory for computer-supported cooperative working remains an open question. Here we demonstrate the usefulness of activity theory in elucidating a series of small group software design meetings. The structure and dynamics of the meetings are presented, as are the work processes of transformation and mediation. Finally, we show how a contradictions analysis can support the derivation of requirements on a system to support the design meetings.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: a case example , 1992, CSCW '92.

[3]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design: principles and practice , 1996 .

[4]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[5]  S. Bødker,et al.  Scenarios as Springboards in Design , 1993 .

[6]  B. Nardi.  Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .

[7]  James V. Wertsch,et al.  Sociocultural studies of mind: The need for action in sociocultural research , 1995 .

[8]  M. W. Wartofsky.  Pictures, Representation, and the Understanding in Models. Representation and the Scientific Understanding. , 1979 .

[9]  Y Engeström,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Objects , contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition : an activity-theoretical perspective , 2003 .

[10]  John Bowers,et al.  Getting others to get it right: an ethnography of design work in the fashion industry , 1996, CSCW '96.

[11]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Situated evaluation for cooperative systems , 1994, CSCW '94.

[12]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[13]  Robert Lewis,et al.  Selecting communication media for distributed communities , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[15]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Searching for unity among diversity: exploring the “interface” concept , 1993, INTERCHI.

[16]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Groupware implementation: reinvention in the sociotechnical frame , 1996, CSCW '96.

[17]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[18]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities , 1998 .

[19]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[20]  Phil Turner,et al.  Structuring scenarios using activity theory. , 1998 .

[21]  Phil Turner,et al.  From description to requirements: an activity theoretic perspective , 1999, GROUP.

[22]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Distributed cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Cooperative Prototyping: Users and Designers in Mutual Activity , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Merging multiple perspectives in groupware use: intra- and intergroup conventions , 1997, GROUP.

[25]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Distributed Cognition in an Airline Cockpit , 1996 .

[26]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Scenario-based design of cooperative systems , 2000 .

[27]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[28]  Bonnie A. Nardi.  Some reflections on the application of activity theory , 1995 .

[29]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Post(-)modern organizations: understanding how CSCW affects organizations , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Coherence: an approach to representing ethnographic analyses in systems design , 1999 .

[31]  F. Blackler.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[32]  Jakob E. Bardram.  Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems , 1997 .

[33]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[34]  Karen Zelan.  Cognition and Communication , 1991 .

[35]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[36]  Susanne Bødker.  Activity Theory as a Challenge to Systems Design , 1990 .

[37]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[38]  M. Cole.  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[39]  Edwin Hutchins.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995 .

[40]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[42]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Coherence: An Approach to Representing Ethnographic Analyses in Systems Design , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities , 1998, CSCW '98.

[44]  Anthony Morris,et al.  Activity Theory and the Analysis of Organizations , 1993 .

[45]  N. Schwarz.  Cognition and Communication , 2004, Inner Worlds.

[46]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[47]  S. L. Star.  The Cultures of Computing , 1995 .

[48]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  Work processes: scenarios as a preliminary vocabulary , 1995 .

[49]  Yrjö Engeström.  Cognition and communication at work: The tensions of judging: Handling cases of driving under the influence of alcohol in Finland and California , 1996 .

[50]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Strategic directions in human-computer interaction , 1996, CSUR.