A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects

With society turning increasingly to sustainable development, sharper demands are being made concerning energy efficiency and other properties that mean reductions in the negative effects of the building on the environment and people. This means that architects must have a suitably adapted solution already in the early design phase, as this has the greatest influence on the final result. Current tools and methods used for this are either focused only on individual topics or are too complex and not adapted for independent use by architects. The paper presents a simplified method for evaluating building sustainability (SMEBS) which addresses these needs. It is intended as a tool to aid architects in the early project planning phases as it allows a quick evaluation of the extent to which the demands of sustainable building are fulfilled. The method was developed on the basis of a study of international building sustainability assessment methods (BSAM) and standards in this field. Experts in sustainable construction were invited to determine weights for assessment parameters using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Their judgments reflect the specific characteristics of the local environment.

[1]  Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik,et al.  A REVIEW OF BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS , 2013 .

[2]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Building Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[4]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[5]  Eva Krídlová Burdová,et al.  Building Environmental Assessment of Construction and Building Materials , 2012 .

[6]  G. Halin,et al.  DaylightGen: From Daylight Intentions to Architectural Solutions , 2013 .

[7]  Betul Bektas Ekici,et al.  Prediction of building energy needs in early stage of design by using ANFIS , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  武彦 福島.  持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[9]  Magda Sibley,et al.  Different Stakeholder Perceptions of Sustainability Assessment , 2008 .

[10]  J. Kurnitski,et al.  Building sustainability objective assessment in Estonian context and a comparative evaluation with LEED and BREEAM , 2014 .

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[12]  Halit Yaşa Ersoy,et al.  Daylight and Energy Oriented Architecture Design Support Model , 2013 .

[13]  W. L. Lee,et al.  A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes , 2013 .

[14]  Shady Attia,et al.  Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design , 2012 .

[15]  Wenbin Mu,et al.  The Copula Function-Based Probability Characteristics Analysis on Seasonal Drought & Flood Combination Events on the North China Plain , 2014 .

[16]  Oriol Pons,et al.  Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain , 2012 .

[17]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment , 2013 .

[18]  S. R. Chandratilake,et al.  Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations , 2013 .

[19]  Ignacio Zabalza,et al.  Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines , 2011 .

[20]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Method and simulation program informed decisions in the early stages of building design , 2010 .

[21]  Klaus D. Goepel,et al.  Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Corporate Enterprises – a New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs , 2013 .

[22]  Toke Rammer Nielsen,et al.  Simple tool to evaluate energy demand and indoor environment in the early stages of building design , 2005 .

[23]  Peter Guthrie,et al.  A conceptual framework for future-proofing the energy performance of buildings , 2012 .

[24]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[25]  Jian Yao.  A Multi-Objective (Energy, Economic and Environmental Performance) Life Cycle Analysis for Better Building Design , 2014 .

[26]  Po-Cheng Chou,et al.  Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005—searching for suitability in Taiwan , 2007 .

[27]  Ulrich Bogenstätter,et al.  Prediction and optimization of life-cycle costs in early design , 2000 .

[28]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[29]  Rajiv Bhatt,et al.  Global Weights of Parameters for Sustainable Buildings from Consultants’ Perspectives in Indian Context , 2012 .

[30]  Lupíšek Antonín.  Multi-criteria assessment of buildings in context of sustainable building , 2013 .

[31]  Klaus Hansen,et al.  Test of BREEAM, DGNB, HQE and LEED on two Danish office buildings , 2011 .

[32]  Heng Li,et al.  Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems , 2008 .

[33]  Paulo Santos,et al.  Assessment of building operational energy at early stages of design – A monthly quasi-steady-state approach , 2014 .

[34]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[35]  U. Berardi.  Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings , 2012 .

[36]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Life cycle carbon dioxide assessment tool for buildings in the schematic design phase , 2013 .