A Comparison of Laser Shearography and C-Scan for Assessing a Glass/Epoxy Laminate Impact Damage

Impact damage is a serious damage mechanism in composite materials, which limits their performance and reliability. Impact damage can occur during in-service applications or as a result of handling during manufacturing. Methods used currently for damage detection are based on different principles, and for that reason, they give a range of results no matter what the real damage is. Therefore, a comparison of the internal real damage with the flaw indications of a glass fibre–reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminate made with two non-destructive technique (NDT) methods has been investigated. Laser shearography measurements and C-scan ultrasonic detection were compared. Metallographic examination and surface indentation measurements provided information about the character of the real damage. Such a comparison has not yet been published because laser shearography is considered a qualitative technique. Each NDT method was able to visualise a different type of damage. The knowledge of the applicability of these methods is the key to taking advantage of both methods by combining their respective strengths. In terms of the reliability, simplicity and rapidity of all of the mentioned techniques, laser shearography turned out to be the most suitable method for the detection of barely visible flaws. The C-scan was more appropriate for precisely defining the inner damage. The tested material was a laminate typically used for ultralight aircraft. Information about the extent of damage is very important for airplane certification and maintenance.

[1]  Roger Brown.  Effect of temperature , 1996 .

[2]  H. Hamada,et al.  Impact response of woven glass-fabric composites - II. Effect of temperature , 1998 .

[3]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Rapid Inspection of Composite Skin-Honeycomb Core Structures with Ultrasonic Guided Waves , 2003 .

[4]  A. Amaro,et al.  NDT OF COMPOSITES: Comparative study of different non-destructive testing techniques in the characterisation and quantification of the damage effects in carbon-epoxy laminates , 2004 .

[5]  T. S. Ramamurthy,et al.  Estimation of impact-induced damage in CFRP laminates through ultrasonic imaging , 1998 .

[6]  Y. Y. Hung.  Shearography for non-destructive evaluation of composite structures , 1996 .

[7]  P. Cawley,et al.  Advances in Thermosonics for Detecting Impact Damage in CFRP Composites , 2006 .

[8]  Francesco Aymerich,et al.  Assessment of NDT interferometric techniques for impact damage detection in composite laminates , 2006 .

[9]  B. Boro Djordjevic,et al.  ULTRASONIC CHARACTERIZATION OF ADVANCED COMPOSITE MATERIALS , 2009 .

[10]  Fu Huimin,et al.  On the Distribution of Delamination in Composite Structures and Compressive Strength Prediction for Laminates with Embedded Delaminations , 2011 .

[11]  G. Zhou,et al.  The use of experimentally-determined impact force as a damage measure in impact damage resistance and tolerance of composite structures , 1998 .

[12]  R. Růžek,et al.  Certification programme of airframe primary structure composite part with environmental simulation , 2009 .

[13]  Wade C. Jackson,et al.  The Use of Impact Force as a Scale Parameter for the Impact Response of Composite Laminates , 1993 .

[14]  Darryl P Almond,et al.  Detecting Low Velocity Impact Damage in Composite Plate Using Nonlinear Acoustic/Ultrasound Methods , 2010 .

[15]  Y. Y. Hung,et al.  NDT&E using shearography with impulsive thermal stressing and clustering phase extraction , 2009 .

[16]  Anthony Chukwujekwu Okafor,et al.  Detection and characterization of high-velocity impact damage in advanced composite plates using multi-sensing techniques , 2001 .

[17]  E. Liniger,et al.  Delamination from edge flaws , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  Jasson Gryzagoridis,et al.  A comparison of the capabilities of portable shearography and portable electronic speckle pattern interferometry , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[19]  John Morton,et al.  Geometrical effects in the low velocity impact response of CFRP , 1989 .

[20]  Yuwen Qin,et al.  Quantitative analysis on sensitivity of shearography in NDT , 2002, International Conference on Experimental Mechanics.

[21]  Anoush Poursartip,et al.  Energy-based approach to impact damage in CFRP laminates , 1997 .

[22]  Serge Abrate,et al.  Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates , 2000 .

[23]  T. Lu,et al.  Laminate Delamination Due to Thermal Gradients , 1995 .

[24]  Andreas Ettemeyer,et al.  Industrial applications of shearography for inspection of aircraft components , 2005, International Conference on Experimental Mechanics.

[25]  Hiroyuki Hamada,et al.  Impact response of woven glass-fabric composites - I. Effect of fibre surface treatment , 1998 .

[26]  Y. Y. Hung,et al.  Shearography: An optical measurement technique and applications , 2005 .

[27]  John Lindberg,et al.  Laser Shearography of Wind Turbine Blades , 2010 .

[28]  Y. Y. Hung,et al.  Review and comparison of shearography and active thermography for nondestructive evaluation , 2009 .

[29]  R. Růžek,et al.  Ultrasonic C-Scan and shearography NDI techniques evaluation of impact defects identification , 2006 .

[30]  I. H. Marshall,et al.  Non-destructive Testing of Fibre-reinforced Plastics Composites: Volume 1. Edited by John Summerscales, 1987. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London. ISBN 1 85166 093 3. Price: £42·00 , 1988 .

[31]  W. Steinchen,et al.  Non-destructive testing of aerospace composite materials using digital shearography , 1998 .

[32]  Darryl P Almond,et al.  Comparison of the defect detection capabilities of flash thermography and vibration excitation shearography , 2010 .

[33]  Eann A. Patterson,et al.  An investigation of the influence of macroscopic heterogeneity on the thermoelastic response of fibre reinforced plastics , 2005 .